Page 270 - IJB-10-3
P. 270

International Journal of Bioprinting                              3D bioscaffolds with SR1 for vasculogenesis




            1. Introduction                                    by  directly  binding  to  and  inhibiting  aryl  hydrocarbon
                                                               receptor (AhR) signaling, which plays a role in the
            The treatment of critical-sized defects caused by serious   regulation of pluripotency and stemness of hematopoietic
            injury is often rendered unsuccessful due to the inherent   stem cells under normal condition. 19-21  A previous study
            limitations of bone grafting, despite the excellent healing   demonstrated a 50-fold increase in CD34  cells in human
                                                                                                +
            capacity of bones.  Therefore, there is an increasing   cord blood CD34  cell-transplanted immunodeficient
                            1
                                                                               +
            demand for bone-repairing implants to circumvent the   mice.  Many studies using CD34  cells have shown a
                                                                   19
                                                                                           +
            limitations of bone grafting, which is generally used to   successful promotion of angiogenesis and osteogenesis.
                                                                                                            11
            treat extensive bone loss.  Other than the traditional   However, the number of CD34  cells available for
                                  1
                                                                                           +
            methods, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting can be   therapeutic purposes is often limited, particularly in adult
            used as a manufacturing technique to produce bone-  tissues. Therefore, evaluating the ability of SR1 to expand
            repairing implants with structural flexibility from a range   the  CD34   cell  population  in vivo  is  required,  to  allow
                                                                       +
            of applicable materials.  Several 3D-bioprinted bone   further studies  examining the  development  of clinical
                                2,3
            scaffolds have been developed using various materials to   therapies targeting CD34  cells.
                                                                                   +
            enhance osteogenesis in previous studies.  However, the
                                             4,5
            failure to promote angiogenesis, an essential step in the   In the early stages of 3D-printed bone scaffold
            repair and regeneration of damaged bone, remains a weak   development, some scaffolds were printed with bioink
            point for 3D-printed bone scaffolds. Without angiogenesis,   that was directly mixed with growth factors, such as
            bone healing would fail due to a lack of essential nutrients   the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or
                      6
            and oxygen.  Therefore, promoting local vascularization   fibroblast growth factor. Recently, scaffolds capable
            is a crucial step for the successful healing of extensive    of sustained release were developed to circumvent
                                                               the limitations of the early-stage scaffolds, which
            bone loss.
                    7
                                                               have short  half-life  and subject  to  swift  loss of
               Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play an important   growth factors. 22,23  In this study, mesoporous silica
            role in the early stages of vascularization.  During the   nanoparticles (MSNs) were added to a 3D-printed
                                               8
            healing process, bone marrow-derived EPCs circulating   scaffold to enable the sustained local release of SR1.
            in the peripheral blood are recruited to injured areas. The   The components of the bone scaffold were selected
            recruited  EPCs  then  form  new  vessels  by  differentiating   considering the advantages of the polymers. Recently,
            into endothelial cells (ECs).  Asahara et al. were the first   natural polymers have been recognized as promising
                                  9
            to identify EPCs that can differentiate into ECs.  Notably,   materials for constructing bone scaffolds because of
                                                  10
            CD34 cells have received considerable attention because of   their favorable biocompatibility, biodegradability, and
                +
                                                                              24
            their neovascularization potential.  Previous studies have   osteoconductivity.  On the other hand, harboring
                                       11
            demonstrated increased vascularization in  myocardial   the capacities to form extracellular matrix and create
                                                                              25
            ischemia  models  and  human  clinical  trials  using  CD34    porous structures,  collagen can be used to manufacture
                                                          +
            cells. 12-14  Additionally, CD34  cells play an important role   scaffolds, i.e., collagen-based scaffolds, which possess
                                   +
            in bone regeneration because of their ability to promote   the desirable characteristics, such as cell attachment and
                                                          +
            vascularization. Previous studies have shown that CD34    osteogenic differentiation. 26-28  Although existing results
            cells contribute not only to vascularization, but also to   indicate that SR1 is a promising material for promoting
            bone healing, as demonstrated by  in vivo experiments   angiogenesis in vitro, the lack of in vivo studies remains
            that locally supplied CD34  cells in rat models of critical-  a challenge in demonstrating the clinical efficacy of

                                 +
            sized femoral defect. 15-18  Many studies have underscored   SR1. Therefore, we aimed to address this gap in the
            the potential of CD34  cells in promoting vascularization,   literature by examining whether the sustained release of
                             +
            signifying that this cell type can be used as an endothelial   SR1 from collagen scaffolds promoted angiogenesis and
            cell source for bone scaffold construction. Therefore,   ultimately increased bone healing using in vivo studies.
            3D-printed bone scaffolds incorporating an angiogenic
            factor that can enhance CD34  populations may lead to   2. Materials and methods
                                     +
            successful bone healing in critical defects. StemRegenin-1   2.1. In vitro studies
            (SR1), a purine derivative molecule promoting CD34 +   In  the  in vitro  studies,  the  cells  were  divided  into  three
            cell expansion, was first identified by Boitano et al.  Co-  groups: (i) negative control (CT) group, in which no
                                                     19
            culturing of monoclonal peripheral blood cells with SR1   treatment was given; (ii) SR1 nanoparticle (SNP) group,
                                         +
            led to a significant increase in CD34  hematopoietic stem   in which the cells were treated with SR1 nanoparticles
            and progenitor cell populations under ex vivo conditions   (final concentration = 1 µM); and (iii) blank nanoparticle
            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       262                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1931
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275