Page 267 - IJB-10-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting organoids for toxicity testing

11. Xu S, Wu C, Guo WB, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics Scalable Stem Cell Culture. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:
inhibit the transformation of Tetrabromobisphenol A by 2995-3004.
the bacterium Rhodococcus jostii. Acs Nano. 2022;16: doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01825
405-414.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c07133 23. Suntornnond R, Ng WL, Huang X, et al. Improving
printability of hydrogel-based bio-inks for thermal inkjet
12. Yu Y, Ma R, Qu H, et al. Enhanced adsorption of bioprinting applications via saponification and heat
tetrabromobisphenol a (TBBPA) on cosmetic-derived treatment processes. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10:5989-6000.
plastic microbeads and combined effects on zebrafish. doi: 10.1039/d2tb00442a
Chemosphere. 2020;248:126067.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126067 24. Below CR, Kelly J, Brown A, et al. A microenvironment-
inspired synthetic three-dimensional model for pancreatic
13. Lua I, Li Y, Zagory JA, et al. Characterization of hepatic ductal adenocarcinoma organoids. Nat Mater. 2022;21:
stellate cells, portal fibroblasts, and mesothelial cells in 110-119.
normal and fibrotic livers. J Hepatol. 2016;64:1137-1146. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01085-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.010
25. Kanninen LK, Harjumaki R, Peltoniemi P, et al. Laminin-511
14. Cuvellier M, Ezan F, Oliveira H, et al. 3D culture of HepaRG and laminin-521-based matrices for efficient hepatic
cells in GelMa and its application to bioprinting of a specification of human pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials.
multicellular hepatic model. Biomaterials, 2021;269:120611. 2016;103:86-100.
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120611 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.054
15. Rowe RG, Daley GQ. Induced pluripotent stem cells in 26. Huo H, Liu F, Luo Y, et al. Triboelectric nanogenerators for
disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat Rev Genet, electro-assisted cell printing. Nano Energy. 2020;67:104150.
2019;20:377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104150
doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0100-z
27. Horiguchi I, Torizal FG, Nagate H, et al. Protection of
16. Soman SS, Vijayavenkataraman S. Applications of 3D human induced pluripotent stem cells against shear stress
bioprinted-induced pluripotent stem cells in healthcare. in suspension culture by Bingham plastic fluid. Biotechnol
Int J Bioprint. 2020;6:280. Prog. 2021;37:e3100.
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i4.280
doi: 10.1002/btpr.3100
17. Palpant NJ, Pabon L, Friedman CE, et al. Generating high-
purity cardiac and endothelial derivatives from patterned 28. Xu L, Hui AY, Albanis E, et al. Human hepatic stellate cell
mesoderm using human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. lines, LX-1 and LX-2:New tools for analysis of hepatic
2017;12:15-31. fibrosis. Gut. 2005;54:142-151.
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.153 doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.042127
18. Yao R, Alkhawtani AYF, Chen R, Luan J, Xu M. Rapid and 29. Caldwell J, Lehner R, Balog S, et al. Fluorescent plastic
efficient in vivo angiogenesis directed by electro-assisted nanoparticles to track their interaction and fate in physiological
bioprinting of alginate/collagen microspheres with human environments. Environ Sci Nano. 2021;8:502-513.
umbilical vein endothelial cell coating layer. Int J Bioprint. doi: 10.1039/D0EN00944J
2019;5:194. 30. Caldwell J, Taladriz-Blanco P, Lehner R, et al. The micro-,
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.194 submicron-, and nanoplastic hunt: A review of detection
19. Takebe T, Sekine K, Enomura M, et al. Vascularized and methods for plastic particles. Chemosphere. 293:133514.
functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133514
transplant. Nature. 2013;499:481-484. 31. Zauner W, Farrow NA, Haines AMR. In vitro uptake of
doi: 10.1038/nature12271 polystyrene microspheres: effect of particle size, cell line and AQ3
20. Li Y, Jiang X, Li L, et al. 3D printing human induced cell density. J Control Release. 2001;71:39-51.
pluripotent stem cells with novel hydroxypropyl chitin doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(00)00358-8
bioink: scalable expansion and uniform aggregation. 32. Lunov O, Syrovets T, Loos C, et al. Differential uptake
Biofabrication. 2018;10:044101. of functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles by human
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aacfc3 macrophages and a monocytic cell line. Acs Nano.
21. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, Sun W. Effect of bioink properties 2011;5:1657-1669.
on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of doi: 10.1021/nn2000756
embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication. 2016;8:035020. 33. Shen R, Yang K, Cheng X, et al. Accumulation of polystyrene
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
microplastics induces liver fibrosis by activating cGAS/
22. Feng L, Liang S, Zhou Y, et al. Three-Dimensional Printing STING pathway. Environ Pollut. 2022;300:118986.
of Hydrogel Scaffolds with Hierarchical Structure for doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118986

Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024) 259 doi: 10.36922/ijb.1403