Page 384 - IJB-10-3
P. 384

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Multi-physical field control inkjet bioprinting




            that the MFCPIB method caused slight damage to cells   Funding acquisition: Run Li, Liming Zhang
            and maintained a high survival rate of cells after printing.   Investigation: Huixuan Zhu, Run Li
            Thus, the MFCPIB method exhibits promising potential   Methodology: Huixuan Zhu, Yuejing Zheng, Heran Wang
            for the utilization in printing cell-laden thermosensitive   Project administration: Kai Guo
            biomaterial and the in vivo experiments in future.  Resources: Huixuan Zhu, Xiongfei Zheng
                                                               Software: Song Li, Feiyang Gao
            4. Conclusion                                      Validation: Yuejing Zheng

            In conclusion, we successfully developed, tested, and   Writing – original draft: Huixuan Zhu
            implemented an innovative MFCPIB method for creating   Writing – review & editing: Lianqing Liu
            highly bioactive tissue-like structures using 5% GelMA. We   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            also demonstrated the feasibility of using this approach with
            other concentrations of GelMA. Our method enables precise   Not applicable.
            control of the formation and properties of microdroplets
            through temperature and pressure regulation. With this   Consent for publication
            method, we have successfully printed various 3D structures,   Not applicable.
            including a cell-laden vascular structure with an aspect
            ratio of 4.0, without compromising the viability of cells. The   Availability of data
            MFCPIB method provides a new approach for inkjet printing
            of thermosensitive materials such as GelMA. This printing   Data  are  available  from  the  corresponding  author  upon
            method has potential applications in biological research   reasonable request.
            and clinical medicine, particularly for creating tissues such
            as esophageal tissues and skin with high bioactivity. While   References
            the current method is unable to print hollow structures,
            we believe that future work involving multi-printheads   1.   Mota C, Camarero-Espinosa S, Baker MB, Wieringa P,
            and low-concentration GelMA as a sacrificial material will   Moroni L. Bioprinting: from tissue and organ development
                                                                  to in vitro models. Chem Rev. 2020;120:10547–10607.
            contribute to the creation of more complex tissues and      doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789
            organs for utilization in clinical medicine.
                                                               2.   Zhou L, Fu J, He Y. A review of 3D printing technologies for
            Acknowledgments                                       soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:2000187.
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/adfm.202000187
            None.
                                                               3.   Wang H, Guo K, Zhang L, et al. Valve-based consecutive
                                                                  bioprinting method for multimaterial tissue-like constructs
            Funding                                               with controllable interfaces. Biofabrication. 2021;13:035001.
            This study was partially supported by the National      doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/abdb86
            Key Research and Development Program of China      4.   Guo K, Wang H, Li S, et al. Bioprinting of light-crosslinkable
            (SQ2020YFB130100), the Youth Innovation Promotion     neutral-dissolved  collagen  to  build  implantable
            Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2021200),   connective tissue with programmable cellular orientation.
            the Research Equipment Development Program of the     Biofabrication. 2023;15:035007.
            Chinese Academy of Sciences (YJKYYQ20190045), the      doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/acc760
            National Natural Science Foundation of China (52205319),   5.   Blaeser  A, Duarte  Campos  DF,  Puster  U,  Richtering  W, 
            CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (YSBR-  Stevens  MM,  Fischer  H. Controlling shear stress in 3D
            041),  and  the  Foundation  of  State  Key  Laboratory  of   bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and
            Robotics (2021-Z01, 2022-Z04, 2023-Z01).              stem cell integrity. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:326-333.
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500677
            Conflict of interest                               6.   Masaeli E, Marquette C. Direct-write bioprinting approach
                                                                  to construct multilayer cellular tissues.  Front Bioeng
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
                                                                  Biotechnol. 2020;7:478.
                                                                  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00478
            Author contributions
                                                               7.   Li X, Chen J, Liu B, Wang X, Ren D, Xu T. Inkjet printing for
            Conceptualization: Huixuan Zhu, Xiongfei Zheng        biofabrication. In: Ovsianikov A, Yoo J, Mironov V, eds. 3D
            Data curation: Huixuan Zhu, Chuang Ji, Runyang Zhu    Printing and Biofabrication. Cham: Springer; 2018: 283-301.
            Formal analysis: Huixuan Zhu, Kai Guo                 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45444-3_26



            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       376                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2120
   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389