Page 389 - IJB-10-3
P. 389

International Journal of Bioprinting                                    Optimizing 3D-printed mouthguards




            Table 1. Mechanical properties of photoinitiators and conventional material ERK
                                         Agilus 30           Vero             D-ABS               ERK
             Tensile strength (MPa)       2.4–3.1           40.0–55.0        55.0–60.0            31.0
             Elongation at break (%)     220.0–270.0        5.0–20.0         25.0–40.0             4.5
             Modulus of elasticity (MPa)   N/A             2200–3000         2600–3000            N/A
             Flexural strength (MPa)       N/A             70–85 MPa         65–75 MPa            N/A
             Flexual modulus (MPa)         N/A             2000–2500         1700–2200            N/A
             Izod notched impact (J/m)     N/A               20–30            90–115              N/A
             Compressive set (%)           6–7               N/A               N/A                N/A
             Tensile tear resistance (N/cm)  4.1–7.1         N/A               N/A                N/A
             Shore hardness               A25–30            D83–86            D85–87              A92
                      3
             Density (g/cm )             1.140–1.150       1.170–1.180       1.170–1.180          0.935
            Abbreviations: D-ABS, digital poly-(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene); ERK, Erkoflex; N/A, no available data.

            Table 2. Mechanical properties of Agilus or/and Vero composited materials (A) defined by various Shore A hardness in average
            conditions
                                         A30      A40       A50       A60        A70       A80        A90
             Tensile strength (MPa)     2.4–3.1   3–4       3–4      3.5–4.5     4–6       6–10       10–14
             Elongation at break (%)   220–270   190–210   170–210   150–170   120–140     70–90      50–70
             Shore hardness (A)         25–30     40–50     50–55     55–60     60–70      80–85      85–90
             Tensile tear resistance (kg/cm)  4.1–7.1  6.0–8.0  7.0–9.0  7.0–10.0  12.0–14.0  22.0–26.0  26.0–30.0


            (A30, A50, A70) with an average thickness of 3 mm on   specifications. Three samples of each type were fabricated
            the labial and buccal surfaces and 2 mm on the occlusal   to decrease the research error.
            and palatal surfaces and double-layer samples, hard outer   Materials samples were designed using Shapr3D, a solid
            layers (D-ABS) covered 0.5 mm for the labial surfaces of
            the anterior region and 1 mm for the entire occlusal surface   modeling computer-aided design application (Shapr3D,
            while soft inner layers covered the remainder, defined as   Budapest, Hungary). MG samples were sculpted in Zbrush
            D-A30, D-A50, and D-A70. Additively manufactured   (Maxon Computer GmbH, Homburg, Germany) following
            MG samples were deposited with single or multiple drops   the scanning  of dental models (Dental standard stone
            of photoinitiator on the build platform and immediately   models; D18FE-500A-QF Nissin Dental Products Inc.,
            solidified with the ultraviolet light passed over the layer   Kyoto, Japan) with an extraoral scanner (D2000, 3shape,
            (Figure 2). By setting the 3D printing process, drops   Copenhagen, Denmark). This scanner has a high accuracy
            of different photoinitiators can be stacked in sequence.   of 5 µm. MG thickness was measured using Materialise
            Two types of conventional custom-made MGs, ERK and   Magics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) for precise
            MG21, were fabricated for comparison with the same   splitting into two pieces.














            Figure 1. Schematic of the two types of materials. (A) Single-layer material sheet sample, 3 mm thickness; (B) double-layer additively manufactured
            material sheet sample, 0.5 mm thickness D-ABS and 2.5 mm thickness Agilus or/and Vero composites.


            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       381                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2469
   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394