Page 413 - IJB-10-3
P. 413

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  In situ thermal monitoring in bioprinting




            5. Conclusion                                      Supervision: Bianca Maria Colosimo, Davide Moscatelli
                                                               Writing – original draft: Simone Giovanni Gugliandolo,
            In conclusion, this study has introduced a novel approach   Bianca Maria Colosimo
            for monitoring bioprinted constructs using thermal   Writing – review & editing:  Bianca  Maria  Colosimo,
            imaging, demonstrating its feasibility and effectiveness. The   Davide Moscatelli
            absence of previous instances employing thermographic
            imaging  for  the  geometric analysis  of  bioprinting   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            constructs emphasizes the innovative nature of this work.
            The successful capture of thermal image sequences in real-  Not applicable.
            time using the employed thermographic imaging device
            allowed for in situ assessment of construct’s geometrical   Consent for publication
            characteristics. Specifically, the method highlighted the   Not applicable.
            ability to qualitatively distinguish between different layers
            based on their temperature disparities.            Availability of data
               Our  method  effectively  overcomes  limitations  posed   Data  are  available  from  the  corresponding  author  upon
            by visible light systems in discerning bioink layers,   reasonable request.
            particularly in transparent bioinks. The method’s capacity
            to segment deposited bioink filaments in real time enables   References
            the measurement of filament width during the printing
            process. Additionally, the technique permitted the isolation   1.   Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick JA, et al. Biofabrication: a
            and separate reconstruction of individual layer profiles,   guide to technology and terminology.  Trends Biotechnol.
            addressing the challenge of layer superposition.      2018;36(4):384-402.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015
               In summary, the application of thermal imaging
            technology  to  construct  bioprinting  represents  an   2.   Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF. Print me an organ! Why we are
            innovative step toward enhancing process monitoring   not there yet. Prog Polym Sci. 2019;97:101145.
            and quality control, laying the foundation for further      doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145
            advancements  in  bioprinting  technology  and  its   3.   Santoni S, Gugliandolo SG, Sponchioni M, Moscatelli D,
            industrial implementation.                            Colosimo BM. 3D bioprinting: current status and trends—a
                                                                  guide  to  the  literature  and  industrial  practice.  Bio-Des
            Acknowledgments                                       Manuf. 2021;5(1):14-42.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/S42242-021-00165-0
            None.
                                                               4.   Pereira FDAS, Parfenov V, Khesuani YD, Ovsianikov A,
                                                                  Mironov V. Commercial 3D bioprinters. In: Ovsianikov
            Funding                                               A, Yoo J, Mironov V, eds. 3D Printing and Biofabrication.
            This  research  was  partially  funded  by  the  European   Cham: Springer; 2018: 535-549.
            Commission under the “HORIZON-CL4-2021-DIGITAL-       doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45444-3_12
            EMERGING-01    project  BioProS  -  Biointelligent  5.   Jang J, Park JY, Gao G, Cho D-W. Biomaterials-based 3D cell
            Production Sensor to  Measure  Viral  Activity”  (grant   printing for next-generation therapeutics and diagnostics.
            agreement no. 101070120, 2022–2026).                  Biomaterials. 2018;156:88-106.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.030
            Conflict of interest                               6.   Constante G, Apsite I, Alkhamis H, et al. 4D biofabrication
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         using a combination of 3D printing and melt-electrowriting
                                                                  of  shape-morphing  polymers.  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.
                                                                  2021;13(11):12767-12776.
            Author contributions                                  doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c18608

            Conceptualization: Bianca Maria Colosimo, Davide   7.   Caleffi JT, Aal MCE, Gallindo H de OM, et al. Magnetic 3D
               Moscatelli, Simone Giovanni Gugliandolo            cell culture: state of the art and current advances. Life Sci.
            Data curation: Simone Giovanni Gugliandolo            2021;286:120028.
            Formal  analysis:  Simone  Giovanni  Gugliandolo,     doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120028
               Egon Prioglio                                   8.   Hu X, Zheng J, Hu Q, et al. Smart acoustic 3D cell
            Investigation: Simone Giovanni Gugliandolo, Egon Prioglio  construct assembly with high-resolution.  Biofabrication.
            Methodology: Bianca Maria Colosimo, Simone Giovanni   2022;14(4).
               Gugliandolo, Egon Prioglio                         doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac7c90

            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       405                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2021
   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418