Page 409 - IJB-10-3
P. 409

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  In situ thermal monitoring in bioprinting




            similarity coefficient (DSC),  a well-established measure   Since the extruder of our bioprinter operated under
                                   50
            commonly employed in image analysis and medical    the fundamental assumptions of consistent object
            imaging applications, between the binarized target image   brightness, limited displacement, and full visibility in all
            (VR or IR) and the relative binarized nominal shape image:  video frames, it was possible to apply a similar approach
                                                               to reconstruct the geometry of each layer of the “step”
                            XYI                                model, through an integration of the segmented pixel
                   DSC =⋅2                              (I)    obtained frame-by-frame.
                            X +  Y
                                                               3. Results
               where  X is the set of foreground pixels in the target   3.1 Comparison of segmentation performance
            image and Y is the corresponding set of foreground pixels   between VR and IR images
            in the binarized nominal shape  image, respectively. The   In the following, results obtained on a seven-layer construct
            DSC value ranges between 0 and 1, where a value closer   printed in the before-mentioned conditions were used as a
            to 0 indicates less spatial overlap between regions X and Y,   reference to show the promising advantage of IR images. In
            while a value closer to 1 indicates a higher degree of spatial   Figure 7, it is possible to see the images of each of the seven
            overlap. By employing this metric, we aimed to quantify   layers captured with the two types of cameras. Each image
            the degree of similarity between the two image sets.  demonstrates the respective reconstructed geometry and
                                                               the calculated DSC value. It is possible to notice that IR
            2.8. Proof-of-concept of on-line geometric         images led to a better geometry reconstruction, confirmed
            reconstruction capability                          not only by visual inspection, albeit with all the relevant
            Since different materials exhibit different thermal   hardware resolution limitations, but also by the DSC
            properties, during the second campaign, it was also decided   values obtained, which were always higher than those
            to implement the developed segmentation algorithm along   obtained for VR images. Furthermore, it is possible to
            with a tracking algorithm, which relied on the Kanade–  identify trends in the performance of the metrics in the
            Lucas–Tomasi (KLT) algorithm, to perform segmentation   two different sets of images.
            of the deposited construct at the time of maximum thermal
            gradient between background and foreground (Figure 6),   3.2. Last layer detection
            to enhance the monitoring capabilities of our system. For   In the course of the experimental campaigns, several
            further details on algorithm implementation, we suggest   samples quite frequently suffered from printing problems,
            the reader refer to a previous work of ours,  where the   which resulted in defects on their appearance.  Figure 8
                                                51
            KLT algorithm, renowned within the field of computer   shows the original VR image, the original IR image, and
            vision for its effectiveness as a feature-based tracking   the IR segmented image of the third layer of a three-layer
            method, showed excellent performance in the tracking of   construct that, despite being printed with the same printing
            the extruder of a 3D printer across consecutive thermal   parameters as the other samples, ran into under-extrusion
            video frames.                                      problems, presenting a “pillar” geometry in the last printed























            Figure 6. On the left, the original IR frame from a video of the second campaign. On the right frame-by-frame integration of the segmented pixel once
            extruded from the nozzle of the first instants of the process.


            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       401                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2021
   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414