Page 466 - IJB-10-3
P. 466

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Biomimetic scaffolds for tendon healing














































            Figure 7.  (A) Metabolic activity of iMATs. Five time points and three cell densities were analyzed. Results are represented as mean ± SD (n = 4). *p < 0.05.
            (B) Relative expression of tendon-related genes in iMATs incubated and embedded in the scaffolds for 3 and 12 days. Relative expression of tendon-related
            genes in iMATs embedded in the scaffolds after incubation for 3 and 12 days. The dashed line indicates equal expression of the analyzed gene on days 3 and
            12. Results are represented as mean ± SD (n = 4). *p < 0.05.


            As it is not the main objective of this study, the correlation   release profile are different (probably due to the difference
            is explained in part F of the Supplementary File.   in the physicochemical composition of the two factors).
                                                               On the one hand, the release rate, which is associated with
            3.6. Incorporation of growth factors               the kinetic constant K, is different for the two factors. In
            3.6.1. Release profiles from the scaffold
            The use of growth factors inside the scaffolds requires prior   the case of the initial phase or fast phase, the constant was
                                                                                         =  0.0883  h   and  K
                                                               greater  for  PDGF-BB  (K
                                                                                                  -1
            characterization, which includes the determination of their   -1       PDGF-BB               VEGF165
            release profiles. For this characterization, quantification   =  0.0396  h ), indicating that this factor was initially
            by ELISA of the released factor into the culture media at   released more rapidly than VEGF165. However, during the
            different times was conducted, and the results are shown in   slow phase, the VEGF165 constant was greater than that of
                                                                                                           -1
                                                                                       -1
            Figure 8. Both factors, VEGF165 and PDGF-BB, showed a   PDGF-BB (K PDGF-BB  = 0.0010 h  and K VEGF165  = 0.0068 h ).
            biphasic release. That is, during the initial phase, which lasts   Another parameter that can be determined from this test is
            approximately for 50 h, the release happens at a faster rate   the half-life value of the factor. This parameter indicates the
            (burst release). This rapid release is related to the swelling   time taken for the concentration of that drug to decrease by
            of the scaffold.  As it absorbs water, the space between the   half of its initial value. It is inversely related to the constant
                       79
            biomolecules is increased and the growth factors can more   K, so the value was lower for PDGF-BB than for VEGF165
            easily diffuse to the media. Afterward, the second phase   (7.85  h and 17.48  h, respectively) in the fast phase and
            begins, in which the release is much slower. Despite having   higher for PDGF-BB than for VEGF165 (687.90  h and
            a similar behavior, the parameters that characterize the   101.43 h, respectively) in the slow phase.

            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       458                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2632
   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471