Page 496 - IJB-10-3
P. 496
International Journal of Bioprinting Stretchable scaffold for modeling fibrosis
of human adult fibroblasts toward cardiac Phenotype. Front doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.048
Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:529. 40. Chen YW, Wang K, Ho CC, Kao CT, Ng HY, Shie MY.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00529
Cyclic tensile stimulation enrichment of Schwann cell-laden
31. Nicoletti L, Paoletti C, Tarricone G, et al. Lipoplexes for auxetic hydrogel scaffolds towards peripheral nerve tissue
effective in vitro delivery of microRNAs to adult human engineering. Mater Des. 2020;195:108982.
cardiac fibroblasts for perspective direct cardiac cell doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108982
reprogramming. Nanomedicine. 2022;45:102589. 41. Donderwinkel I, Van Hest JCM, Cameron NR. Bio-inks for
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2022.102589
3D bioprinting: recent advances and future prospects. Polym
32. Schipani R, Nolan DR, Lally C, Kelly DJ. Integrating finite Chem. 2017;8:4451-71.
element modelling and 3D printing to engineer biomimetic doi: 10.1039/c7py00826k
polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Connect Tissue 42. Ward M, Iskratsch T. Mix and (mis-)match – the
Res. 2020;61(2):174-189. mechanosensing machinery in the changing environment
doi: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1656720
of the developing, healthy adult and diseased heart. Biochim
33. Carmagnola I, Chiono V, Ruocco G, et al. Plga membranes Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2020;1867(3):118436.
functionalized with gelatin through biomimetic mussel- doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.01.017
inspired strategy. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(11):1-17. 43. Sirry MS, Butler JR, Patnaik SS, et al. Characterisation of
doi: 10.3390/nano10112184
the mechanical properties of infarcted myocardium in the
34. Melilli G, Carmagnola I, Tonda-Turo C, et al. DLP 3D rat under biaxial tension and uniaxial compression. J Mech
printing meets lignocellulosic biopolymers: carboxymethyl Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;63:252-264.
cellulose inks for 3D biocompatible hydrogels. Polymers doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.029
(Basel). 2020;12(8):1-11. 44. Arani A, Arunachalam SP, Chang ICY, et al. Cardiac
doi: 10.3390/POLYM12081655
MR elastography for quantitative assessment of elevated
35. Ding H, Illsley NP, Chang RC. 3D Bioprinted GelMA based myocardial stiffness in cardiac amyloidosis. J Magn Reson
models for the study of Trophoblast cell invasion. Sci Rep. Imaging. 2017;46(5):1361-1367.
2019;9(1):18854. doi: 10.1002/JMRI.25678
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55052-7
45. Vedadghavami A, Minooei F, Mohammadi MH, et al.
36. Fedorovich NE, Oudshoorn MH, van Geemen D, Hennink Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled
WE, Alblas J, Dhert WJ. The effect of photopolymerization mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications.
on stem cells embedded in hydrogels. Biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:42-63.
2009;30(3):344-353. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.037
46. Chaudhuri O, Cooper-White J, Janmey PA, Mooney DJ,
37. Sadeghi AH, Shin SR, Deddens JC, et al. Engineered 3D Shenoy VB. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity
cardiac fibrotic tissue to study fibrotic remodeling. Adv on cellular behaviour. Nature. 2020;584(7822):
Healthc Mater. 2017;6(11):1-14. 535-546.
doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601434 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2O
38. McCain ML, Lee H, Aratyn-Schaus Y, Kléber AG, Parker 47. Choi JR, Yong KW, Choi JY, Cowie AC. Recent advances in
KK. Cooperative coupling of cell-matrix and cell-cell photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for biomedical applications.
adhesions in cardiac muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Biotechniques. 2019;66(1):40-53.
2012;109(25):9881-9886. doi: 10.2144/btn-2018-0083
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203007109
48. Ruocco G, Zoso A, Mortati L, Carmagnola I, Chiono V.
39. Rajabi N, Kharaziha M, Emadi R, Zarrabi A, Mokhtari H, Biomimetic electrospun scaffold-based in vitro model
Salehi S. An adhesive and injectable nanocomposite hydrogel of resembling the Hallmarks of human myocardial fibrotic
thiolated gelatin/gelatin methacrylate/Laponite® as a potential tissue. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(7):4368-4380.
surgical sealant. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;564:155-169. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00483
Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024) 488 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2247

