Page 624 - IJB-10-3
P. 624

International Journal of Bioprinting                       Wireless module system applied on 3D-printed implant




            battery volume/overall weight reduction, and battery   Methodology: Hsiao-Kuan Wu, Pei-Jung Tsai
            capability enhancement to allow for battery installation on   Writing – original draft: Cheng-Hsien Wu, Chun-Li Lin
            the patient-specific implant for biomechanics detection.   Writing – review & editing: Cheng-Hsien Wu, Chun-Li Lin
            Besides, the WMS should also be compliant with U.S.
            Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pre-clinical testing   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            requirements, such as meeting IEC60601 electrical safety   Not applicable.
            standards to mitigate risks. Furthermore, the patient-
            specific implant may need to be designed with enough   Consent for publication
            internal space to accommodate the WMS and should
            align with the surgical procedures of clinical physicians.   Not applicable.
            It should be highlighted that conducting biomechanical
            in vitro fatigue tests with sole emphasis on single-point   Availability of data
            axial load forces is a limitation of this study for not able   Data  are  available  from  the  corresponding  author  upon
            to explore the effects of other axial load forces. Following   reasonable request.
            the successful application of the wireless module, future
            tests should expand their design to simulate more complex   References
            clinical occlusal scenarios. Moreover, it is essential to
            conduct tests on implants in other mandibular areas to   1.   Lim HK, Choi YJ, Choi WC, Song IS, Lee UL. Reconstruction
            provide a comprehensive assessment.                   of maxillofacial bone defects using patient-specific long-
                                                                  lasting titanium implants. Sci Rep. 2022;12:7538.
            5. Conclusion                                         doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11200-0

            This study developed a miniature wireless module for   2.   Cheng KJ, Liu YF, Wang R, et al. Topological optimization
            strain measurement, capable of transmitting strain signals   of 3D printed bone analog with PEKK for surgical
            through a Bluetooth-enabled APP system. The relationships   mandibular  reconstruction.  J  Mech  Behav  Biomed  Mater.
                                                                  2020;107:103758.
            between strain, voltage, and force were determined, and      doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103758
            the accuracy of our WMS was verified using cantilever
            beam model for the WMS. Biomechanical in vitro fatigue   3.   Jung HW, Lee BS, Kwon YD, et al. Retrospective clinical
            tests suggest that the developed wireless module’s strain   study of mandible fractures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac
            measurement system could potentially be utilized in a      Surg. 2014;40(1):21-26.
                                                                  doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.1.21
            mandibular 3D-printed patient-specific implant to predict
            its biomechanical behavior in the future. Current fatigue   4.   Maurer P, Eckert AW, Kriwalsky MS, Schubert J. Scope and
            experimental results revealed that applying single-point   limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: a long-
            axial load force on the premolar led to fewer fatigue cycles   term follow-up. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48(2):100-
            and an increased susceptibility of the implant to failure due      104.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.07.005
            to the higher bending moment.
                                                               5.   Lee SW, Kim HG, Ham MJ, Hong DGK, Kim SG, Rotaru H.
            Acknowledgments                                       Custom implant for reconstruction of mandibular continuity
                                                                  defect. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76:1370-1376.
            None.                                                 doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.12.003

            Funding                                            6.   Patel A, Harrison P, Cheng A, Bray B, Bell RB. Fibular
                                                                  reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible with immediate
            This study was supported in part by NSTC project      implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation: jaw in a day.
            112-2221-E-A49-009-MY3 and 111-2327-B-A49-006, Taiwan.  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019;31:369-986.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.002
            Conflict of interest                               7.   Toure G, Gouet E. Use of a 3-dimensional custom-
                                                                  made porous titanium prosthesis for mandibular body
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
                                                                  reconstruction with prosthetic dental rehabilitation and
                                                                  lipofilling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1305-1313.
            Author contributions                                  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.026
            Conceptualization: Cheng-Hsien Wu, Chun-Li Lin     8.   Zhang L, Liu Z, Li B, et al. Evaluation of computer-assisted
            Formal analysis: Hsiao-Kuan Wu, Pei-Jung Tsai         mandibular reconstruction with vascularized fibular flap
            Investigation: Cheng-Hsien Wu, Hsiao-Kuan Wu, Pei-Jung   compared to conventional surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
               Tsai, Chun-Li Lin                                  Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;121(2):139-148.

            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       616                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2553
   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628