Page 625 - IJB-10-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Wireless module system applied on 3D-printed implant

doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.005 15. Bedogni A, Bettini G, Bedogni G, et al. Safety of boneless
reconstruction of the mandible with a CAD/CAM designed
9. Wilkman T, Apajalahti S, Wilkman E, Törnwall J, Lassus
P. A comparison of bone resorption over time: an analysis titanium device: the replica cohort study. Oral Oncol.
of the free scapular, iliac crest, and fibular microvascular 2021;112:105073.
flaps in mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105073
2017;75(3):616-621. 16. Cozzolino F, Apicella D, Wang G, Apicella A, Sorrentino R.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.009 Implant-to-bone force transmission: a pilot study for in vivo
10. Kawasaki G, Imayama N, Yoshitomi I, Furukawa K, strain gauge measurement technique. J Mech Behav Biomed
Umeda M. Clinical study of reconstruction plates used in Mater. 2019;90:173-181.
the surgery for mandibular discontinuity defect. In Vivo. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.014
2019;33(1):191-194. 17. Arami A, Delaloye JR, Rouhani H, Jolles BM, Aminian
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11458 K. Knee implant loosening detection: a vibration analysis
11. van Kootwijk A, Moosabeiki V, Saldivar MC, et al. Semi- investigation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46(1):97-107.
automated digital workflow to design and evaluate patient- doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1941-2
specific mandibular reconstruction implants. J Mech Behav 18. Seide K, Aljudaibi M, Weinrich N, et al. Telemetric assessment
Biomed Mater. 2022;132:105291. of bone healing with an instrumented internal fixator: a
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105291
preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(3):398-404.
12. Lin CL, Wang YT, Chang CM, Wu CH, Tsai WH. Design doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27550
criteria for patient-specific mandibular continuity defect
reconstructed implant with lightweight structure using 19. Schupp W, Arzdorf M, Linke B, Gutwald R. Biomechanical
weighted topology optimization and validated with testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental
biomechanical fatigue testing. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(1):437. resection of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i1.437 2007;65:924-930.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.306
13. Li CH, Wu CH, Lin CL. Design of a patient-specific mandible
reconstruction implant with dental prosthesis for metal 3D 20. Lin CL, Wang JC, Chang WJ. Biomechanical interactions
printing using integrated weighted topology optimization in tooth-implant‐supported fixed partial dentures with
and finite element analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector
2020;105:103700. type: a finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103700 2008;19:107–117.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01363.x
14. Subash P, Nerurkar SA, Krishnadas A, Vinay V, Iyer S,
Manju V. Patient specific alloplastic implant reconstruction 21. Ren R, Spaan J, Jordan A, Shafiro A, Su EP. Novel use of an
of mandibular defects-safe practice recommendations and accelerometer to assess load asymmetry over time after hip
guidelines. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(Suppl 1):28-36. resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(7S):S58-S64.
doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01881-z doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.015

Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024) 617 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2553