Page 104 - IJB-4-1
P. 104

Mehri Behbehani, et al.

            5. Conclusion                                      4.  Hallgren A, Bjorkman A, Chemnitz A, et al., 2013,
                                                                   Subjective outcome related to donor site morbidity after
            This study presented a novel DRG in vitro model that   sural nerve graft harvesting: A survey in 41 patients.
            allows the testing of intraluminal fibre scaffolds inside  BMC Surg, 13 (1): 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482
            nerve guides for the use in peripheral nerve repair.   –13–39
            This model can be used to assess the performance of  5.  Deumens R, Bozkurt A, Meek M F, et al., 2010,
            different fibre scaffold candidates in one experimental  Repairing injured peripheral nerves: Bridging the gap.
            setup. Fibres of different dimensions like nano or     Prog Neurobiol, 92(3): 245-276. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.
            microfibres, different diameter, materials and packing  pneurobio.2010.10.002
            densities can be studied. The migration and proliferation  6.  Meek M F, Coert J H, 2008, US Food and Drug
            of Schwann cells as well as the extensions of axons    Administration /Conformit Europe-approved absorbable
            from the DRG body into the NGC serve as evaluation     nerve conduits for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial
            tools. Additionally, cell infiltration into the scaffold  nerves. Ann Plast Surg, 60(1): 110–116. http://doi.org/
            architecture can be studied, looking particularly on   10.1097/SAP.0b013e31804d441c
            cell outgrowth length and cell viability in the scaffold  7.  Kehoe S, Zhang X F, Boyd D, 2012, FDA approved
            core. Therefore, the current model has a major         guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury:
            advantage of evaluating biomaterial chemistry and      A review of materials and efficacy. Injury, 43(5):
            medical device design prototypes, and consequently     553–572. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.12.030
            may result in the refinement of leading candidate  8.  Ma F, Xiao Z, Meng D, et al., 2014, Use of natural neural
            designs prior to further, more detailed, in vivo analysis.  scaffolds consisting of engineered vascular endothelial
                                                                   growth factor immobilized on ordered collagen fibers
            Acknowledgments                                        filled in a collagen tube for peripheral nerve regeneration

            We are grateful to the EPSRC (U.K.) for funding of a   in  rats.  Int  J  Mol  Sci,  15(10):  18593–18609.
            studentship to MB (EP/L505055/1). This work was        http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151018593
            co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the         9.  Koh H S, Yong T, Teo W E, et al., 2010, In vivo study of
            European Union and the European Community’s            novel nanofibrous intra-luminal guidance channels to
            Seventh Framework Programme (FP7–NMP–2013–             promote nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng, 7(4): 046003.
                                                                   http://doi.org/10.1088/1741–2560/7/4/046003
            SME–7) for NEURIMP under grant agreement no
            604450. Confocal and 2-photon microscopy was       10. Jeffries E M, Wang Y, 2013, Incorporation of parallel
                                                                   electrospun fibers for improved topographical guidance
            performed at the University of Sheffield (U.K.) Kroto   in 3D nerve guides. Biofabrication, 5(3): 035015.
            Research Institute Confocal Imaging Facility, with     http://doi.org/10.1088/1758–5082/5/3/035015
            thanks to Dr. Nicola Green for microscopy assistance.
                                                               11. Ngo T T, Waggoner P J, Romero A A, et al., 2003,
            Conflict of interest                                   Poly(L-lactide) microfilaments enhance peripheral nerve
                                                                   regeneration across extended nerve lesions. J Neurosci
            The authors do not have a conflict of interest.        Res, 72(2): 227–238. http://doi.org/10.1002/ jnr.10570
                                                               12. Faroni A, Mobasseri S A, Kingham P J, et al., 2015,
            References                                             Peripheral nerve regeneration: Experimental strategies

             1.  Rotshenker S, 2011, Wallerian degeneration: The   and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 82–83:
                 innate-immune response to traumatic nerve injury. J  160–167. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.010
                 Neuroinflammation, 8 (1): 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1186/  13. Griffin M F, Malahias M, Hindocha S, et al., 2014,
                 1742–2094–8–109                                   Peripheral nerve injury: Principles for repair and
             2.  Sunderland S, 1951, A classification of peripheral nerve  regeneration. Open Orthop J, 8: 199–203. http://doi.org/
                                                                   10.2174/1874325001408010199
                 injuries producing loss of function. Brain, 74(4):  14. Toba T, Nakamura T, Shimizu Y, et al., 2001, Regeneration
                 491–516.                                          of canine peroneal nerve with the use of a polyglycolic
             3.  Brenner M J, Hess J R, Myckatyn T M, et al., 2006,  acid-collagen tube filled with laminin-soaked collagen
                 Repair of motor nerve gaps with sensory nerve inhibits  sponge: A comparative study of collagen sponge and
                 regeneration in rats. Laryngoscope, 116(9): 1685–1692.  collagen fibers as filling materials for nerve conduits. J
                 http://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000229469.31749.91  Biomed Mater Res, 58(6): 622–630.

             10                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 1
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109