Page 51 - IJB-4-1
P. 51

3D Printing of hydrogel composite systems: Recent advances in technology for tissue engineering

           alginate scaffolds increased. In vitro cellular response using   (GelMA) or GelMA with hyaluronic acid methacrylate
           pre-osteoblast cells exhibited that silica coated collagen/  (HAMA) on pure alginate or alginate/hydroxyapatite (HAp)
           alginate scaffolds had higher value of proliferation and   composites by 3D plotting [110] . Incorporation of hydroxyapatite
           gene expression than pure hydrogel scaffolds. Wang et al.   increased the elastic modulus of printed hydrogel composites
           added various kinds of bioglass including polyphosphate   and HAMA in GelMA hydrogels improved chondrogenesis.
                          2+
           (polyP), polyP*Ca -complex, silica, and biosilica produced   The polycaprolactone (PCL) and alginate were printed layer-
           by sol-gel method in to alginate/gelatin/SaOS-2 bone cell   by-layer with a multihead deposition system as shown in
           hydrogels composites [108] . Each of the mixed pastes were   (Figure 10A) [111] . These hydrogel composites combined
           extruded by 3D bioplotter and results showed that the   chondrocyte cells and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-
           added polyP and biosilica increased the proliferation and   beta) to mimic the properties of cartilage. PCL/alginate
           mineralization of bone cells.                       scaffolds with TGF-beta showed higher cartilaginous ECM
           4.2 Soft Tissue Engineering Application             formation. In vivo test using dorsal subcutaneous zone of
                                                               nude mouse showed that the amounts of collagen fibers and
           Cartilage is a kind of soft tissue, which is a complex   cartilaginous tissue formation of chondrocyte encapsulated
           structure composed of interstitial fluid, collagen and   PCL/alginate scaffolds with TGF-beta were higher than other
           chondrocytes. Cartilage tissue engineering has been   control hydrogels. PCL was also used as composite material
           widely investigated because the injured cartilage does not   for cartilage tissue engineering applications [112] . Electrospun
           heal or regenerate by itself [109] . Hydrogels are excellent   PCL and fibrin/collagen hydrogel containing chondrocytes
           alternatives for use in cartilage engineering since they are   were fabricated layer by layer by hybrid inkjet printing/
           highly hydrated with a cross-linked architecture that can   electrospinning system. The printed hybrid composite scaffolds
           be filled with cells. These hydrogels scaffolds can be easily   showed higher tensile properties compared with each of the
           prepared by 3D printing but their poor mechanical stability   PCL and fibrin/collagen hydrogels alone. Printed chondrocytes
           remains a big challenge. Therefore, many researchers have   cells maintained more than 80% of viability in vitro and
           put in efforts to overcome this limitation by mixing pure   large amounts of collagen and glycosaminoglycans which
           hydrogels and fillers.                              are similar to elastic cartilage were produced in vivo. In order
            Bartnikowski fabricated multi-layered hydrogel com-  to fabricate tough hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering
           posites comprising functionalized gelatin methacrylamide   applications, agar was combined with alginate by Wei et





































           Figure 10.  Schematics of (A) the 3D printing process of chondrocyte-incorporated alginate-PCL hybrid scaffold for cartilage application
           (reproduced with permission from [111]. Copyright 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd) and (B) the direct bioprinting process of collagen-
           fibrinogen with stem cells onto skin wound of rat (reproduced with permission from [116]. Copyright 2012, AlphaMed Press).

           18                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 1
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56