Page 55 - IJB-4-1

3D Printing of hydrogel composite systems: Recent advances in technology for tissue engineering

and serve as a platform to design innovative combinations 9. Gaharwar A K, Peppas N A and Khademhosseini A, 2014,
of materials and 3D printing techniques for emerging Nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications.
applications, such as cancer modeling and organ-on-a-chip Biotechnol Bioeng, 111(3): 441–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
models.
bit.25160
Conflict of Interest and Funding 10. Xu K, Wang J H, Chen Q, et al., 2008, Spontaneous volume

No conflict of interest was reported by all authors. This transition of polyampholyte nanocomposite hydrogels based on
research was supported by AcRF Tier 1 grant 2017- pure electrostatic interaction. J Colloid Interface Sci, 321(2):
T1-001-246 (RG51/17) from Ministry of Education of 272–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.02.024
Singapore, and Basic Science Research Program (No.
2015R1D1A1A01057311 & 2017R1A6A3A03008914) 11. Kabiri K, Omidian H, Zohuriaan-Mehr M J, et al., 2011,
through the National Research Foundation of Korea Superabsorbent hydrogel composites and nanocomposites:
(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future A review. Polym Compos, 32(2): 277–289. http://dx.doi.
Planning. org/10.1002/pc.21046

References 12. Thoniyot P, Tan M J, Karim A A, et al., 2015, Nanoparticle-
Hydrogel composites: Concept, design, and applications of
1. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z W, et al., 2017, 3D printing of these promising, multi-functional materials. Adv Sci, 2(1–2).
polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/Advs.201400010
Compos B Eng, 110: 442–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 13. Lee J W, Kim S Y, Kim S S, et al., 1999, Synthesis and
j.compositesb.2016.11.034 characteristics of interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel
2. Chua C K and Leong K F, 3D printing and additive composed of chitosan and poly(acrylic acid). J Appl Polym
manufacturing : Principles and applications, 4 ed. Sci, 73(1): 113–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
th
Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 2015. 4628(19990705)73:1<113::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-D
3. Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, et al., 2012, A review 14. Ehrburger P and Donnet J B, 1980, Interface in composite-
of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for materials. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, 294(1411):
tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 33(26): 6020–6041. http:// 495–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1980.0059
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 15. Jeong S H, Koh Y H, Kim S W, et al., 2016, Strong and
4. Ballyns J J, Gleghorn J P, Niebrzydowski V, et al., 2008, biostable hyaluronic acid-calcium phosphate nanocomposite
Image-guided tissue engineering of anatomically shaped hydrogel via in situ precipitation process. Biomacromolecules,
implants via MRI and micro-CT using injection molding. 17(3): 841–851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01557
Tissue Eng Part A, 14(7): 1195–1202. http://dx.doi. 16. Wust S, Godla M E, Muller R, et al., 2014, Tunable hydrogel
org/10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0186 composite with two-step processing in combination with
5. Chia H N and Wu B M, 2015, Recent advances in 3D innovative hardware upgrade for cell-based three-dimensional
printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng, 9(1): 4 http://dx.doi. bioprinting. Acta Biomater, 10(2): 630–640. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1186/S13036-015-0001-4 org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.016
6. Seyednejad H, Gawlitta D, Kuiper R V, et al., 2012, In vivo 17. Duan B, Hockaday L A, Kang K H, et al., 2013, 3D Bioprinting
biocompatibility and biodegradation of 3D-printed porous of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin
scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly(epsilon- hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A, 101(5): 1255–1264. http://
caprolactone). Biomaterials, 33(17): 4309–4318. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34420
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.002 18. Melchels F P W, Feijen J and Grijpma D W, 2010, A review
7. Wu G H and Hsu S H, 2015, Review: Polymeric-Based 3D on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical
printing for tissue engineering. J Med Bioeng, 35(3): 285– engineering. Biomaterials, 31(24): 6121–6130. http://dx.doi.
292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40846-015-0038-3 org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
8. Utech S and Boccaccini A R, 2016, A review of hydrogel- 19. Bertsch A, Jiguet S, Bernhard P, et al., 2003, Microstere-
based composites for biomedical applications: Enhancement olithography: A review. Rapid Prototyping Technologies, 758:
of hydrogel properties by addition of rigid inorganic fillers. J 3–15.
Mater Sci, 51(1): 271–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853- 20. Beluze L, Bertsch A and Renaud P, 1999, Microstereolitho-
015-9382-5 graphy: A new process to build complex 3D objects. Design,

22 International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 1