Page 184 - IJB-10-4
P. 184

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Effects of structure on the interbody cage




            to the success of the procedure. The blank control samples   CO  atmosphere for 1, 4, and 7 days, with medium changes
                                                                  2
            (group without SBF immersion degradation) were immersed   every day. After the incubation period, the supernatant was
            in distilled water at 37°C for 60 min of state conditioning, and   discarded, and a PBS wash was performed. Subsequently, 500
            then removed from the distilled water for direct mechanical   μL of medium containing 10% Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-
            testing. The experimental group sample was removed from   8, Invigentech, USA) was added to each well. The cells were
            the immersion solution and then placed in distilled water at   further cultured for 2 h in an incubator at 37°C. Finally, the
            37°C for 60 min of state conditioning for direct mechanical   absorbance at 450 nm was measured using an ELISA reader.
            testing, and the samples should be kept in a wet state during
            the test. To avoid the test sample sliding in the fixture, the   3. Results and discussion
            end parts of the samples face and other items were dried with   3.1. Structural design and modeling of the
            paper towels. The uniaxial compression test was carried out   interbody fusion cage
            by  utilizing  a  universal  testing  machine:  the  compression   Since the form and structure of the test samples may impact
            rate was 1 mm/min; the height was 5 mm; and the    the degradation process of the samples, the test samples
            compression percentage was 60%. The compressive strength   should be comparable to the shape and structure of the
            and compressive modulus of the samples before and after   final product to ensure the reliability of the experimental
            degradation of various structures were eventually obtained.  results. For the convenience of the mechanical tests, the

            2.4. Cell viability assay                          interbody fusion cage was simplified by planarizing the
            The complete cell culture medium was prepared by   upper and lower surfaces of the sample. In order to ensure
            mixing Minimum Essential Medium (MEM, Corning,     the stability of the interbody fusion cage after implantation,
            USA) with fetal bovine serum (FBS, Procell, China) at a   the outer contour of the interbody fusion cage should be as
            ratio of 9:1. Additionally, 1% of antibiotics (penicillin   large as possible. At the same time, it should not exceed
            and streptomycin, P/S) were added. MG-63 cells (iCell   the outer contour line of the vertebral body to avoid the
            Bioscience Inc., Shanghai, China) were cultured in an   compression of the surrounding tissues, and the interbody
                                                               fusion cage should be placed in a flatter area of the cone.
            incubator at 37℃ with a 5% CO  atmosphere.         Since most patients with cervical spondylosis, according to
                                     2
               Different masses (100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg) of PCL raw   epidemiologic surveys and hospital data, are affected by a
            materials and PCL/HA composite materials, as well as cages   pathological condition in the C5/6 segment, the design of
            with different structural characteristics, were separately   the cage in this study was based on the external morphology
            placed in 24-well plates after sterilization using ultraviolet   of the endplate surface of the C6 cone. The cross-sectional
            light. Three specimens were tested for each sample. MG-63   profile of the designed interbody fusion cage is shown in
            cells in the logarithmic growth phase were counted, and the   Figure 3A. SolidWorks was used to model the interbody
            cell density was adjusted to 2 × 10  cells/well before inoculating   fusion cage, as illustrated in Figure 3B. Its cross-sectional
                                    4
            the cells into 24-well plate containing the samples. The cells   profile was horseshoe-shaped, with a circular arc of radius
            were then incubated in an incubator at 37°C with a 5%   12 mm at the top, maximum widths of 14.5 mm at the left
























            Figure 3. Exterior structural design of the interbody fusion cage. (A) The cross-sectional profile of the cage on the C6 vertebra. (B) Basic exterior
            dimensions of the cage.


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       176                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1996
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189