Page 185 - IJB-10-4
P. 185

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Effects of structure on the interbody cage




            and right, 12 mm at the top and bottom, and a bottom   diameter of the porous cages was 461.44 ± 31.03 μm
            length of 10 mm, with four corners rounded by arcs of   when the filling rate was 60%, and the pore diameter of
            radius 2 mm, and a thickness of 5 mm.              the porous cages was 896.64 ± 41.94 μm when the filling
                                                               rate was 40%. The beam diameter of each cage was 514.67
            3.2. Appearance structure and morphology           ± 24.23 μm. However, as the filling rate decreased and the
            examination of the cages                           aperture  diameter increased, the gap  between  adjacent
            Printing consumables have a significant impact on the   beams widened. Moreover, due to slower cooling after
            printing process and the quality and appearance of the final   extrusion from the nozzle, the overhanging portion of the
            product. In tissue-engineering research, to avoid increased   upper beams experienced shrinkage and sagging when
            brittleness and mechanical performance degradation   the filling angle was altered. This phenomenon was most
            caused by high concentrations of ceramics, the majority of   pronounced when there was only one layer crossing. The
            PCL/HA composite materials have an inorganic ceramic   SEM morphology of the vertical segment of the cage is
            content below 30 wt%. Among them, PCL with 10 wt% HA
            exhibits the best printability, characterized by low surface   illustrated in  Figure 4M–R. In the vertical scale, the
            roughness, high interlayer uniformity, and high stability   internal holes are rectangular holes with different heights,
            in scaffold dimensions.  PCL scaffolds with 25 wt% HA   and the holes become larger with the increase of the
                               20
            demonstrate the best overall performance.  Therefore,   number of crossing layers of the beams. The hole heights
                                                19
            cages were built using composites with 25 wt% HA content   of the fusion apparatus with 60% filling rate (group A) are
            in this investigation.                             119.11 ± 9.17 μm, 452.91 ± 8.04 μm, and 962.69 ± 16.57
                                                               μm, respectively, when the number of crossing layers is
               The porous spinal interbody fusion cages with   1, 2, and 4. However, due to the sagging phenomenon of
            various structural characteristics manufactured via melt   the beams, the vertical pore heights of the fusers with a
            differential 3D printing are depicted in Figure 4A–F. They   40% filling rate (group B) are reduced, measuring 85.06
            are all horseshoe-shaped in appearance, with the radius of   ± 26.39 μm, 305.75 ± 9.17 μm, and 906.73 ± 16.75 μm,
            the upper arc of 12 mm, the maximum width of the left and   respectively. The SEM morphology of the vertical profile
            right of 14.45 ± 0.04 mm, the maximum width of the upper   also demonstrated that the cages with a small number
            and lower of 12 ± 0.05 mm, and the thickness of 5.1 ± 0.02   of crossing layers of the beams had fewer holes on the
            mm. The size is almost consistent with that of computer-  vertical scale. Natural bone has an interconnected porous
            aided design (CAD) model size, and the printing error is   structure with a porosity of around 65% and a pore size of
            within 0.2 mm.                                     roughly 200–800 μm. 22,39  It is commonly assumed that a
               According to the SEM topography from the top of   pore size of 100–500 μm is beneficial for the proliferation,
            the cage, as illustrated in Figure 4G–L, all holes on the   migration, and nutrient transfer of bone tissue cells.
                                                                                                            33
            constructed porous cages are square in shape. The pore   The pore size of the fusion apparatus of the AII structure



























            Figure 4. (A–F) 3D-printed cages with varied structural features. (G–L) Upper view and (M–R) vertical section of 3D-printed cages; observed with SEM
            at 80× magnification.


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       177                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1996
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190