Page 190 - IJB-10-4
P. 190

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Effects of structure on the interbody cage




            growth of the pore diameter and the number of crossing   of the beams increased, the compressive modulus of the
            layers of the beams. The compressive strength of human   cages  all  increased.  This  is  because  a  larger  number  of
            cancellous bone ranges from 2 to 12 MPa.  In the initial   crossing layers of beams also implies that there are more
                                              15
            state before in vitro degradation, the compressive strengths   bases of beams stacked in the same direction, resulting in
            of the six structures were 5.48 MPa, 4.74 MPa, 3.58 MPa,   an increase in the vertical stiffness of the total structure.
            4.42 MPa, 4.37 MPa, and 3.31 MPa, which were higher   When the filling rate was 40%, the compressive modulus
            than the minimum compressive strength requirement of   of the fusion in the initial state was also positively
            human cancellous bone (orange dashed line in Figure 8).   correlated with the number of staggered layers of the
            This indicates that the initial state of the prepared cages   beams. Although it appears to be different on days 7 and
            could  satisfy  the  basic  strength  requirement  of  spinal   21, the difference in the compressive modulus values
            fusion. However, a larger number of crossing layers means   for the three structural features was not significant. The
            that more beams are stacked in the same direction, and   compressive modulus of the fusion of the six structures
            very likely they will collapse during compression, leading   in the initial condition was 101.9 MPa, 118.25 MPa,
            to a reduction in compressive strength. With the rise of   126.78 MPa, 98.54 MPa, 101.07 MPa, and 104.18 MPa,
            degradation time, the compressive strength of cages in   respectively. During the 28-day degrading process, the
            each group dropped. After 28 days of degradation, the   fusion’s compressive modulus did not vary considerably
            cages with a 60% filling rate (group A) still maintained   and mainly fluctuated in the range of 80 to 130 MPa. This
            higher compressive strength than that necessary for   may affect the effectiveness of spinal fusion.
            cancellous bone, but the cages with a 40% filling rate
            (group B) no longer fulfilled the basic strength criteria. In   3.5. Cell cytotoxicity assay
            addition, the compressive strength of the AI-structured   The biological characterization is an important indicator
            cage was virtually the same as that of the original   for evaluating the suitability of spinal interbody fusion
                                                               devices for implantation. Figure 10 presents the CCK-
            condition after 28 days of degradation, suggesting that it   8 assay results for 100 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg PCL
            might provide more stable support throughout the spinal   raw materials and PCL/HA composite materials, as
            fusion process.
                                                               well as  cages  with  different  structural  characteristics.
               Figure 9 illustrates the compressive modulus of each   The results show that the PCL materials used in the
            group of cages at different degrees of degradation. As   experiments exhibit some cytotoxicity. The addition of
            can be seen from the figure, when the filling rate was   the samples resulted in a decrease in the cell viability of
            controlled at 60%, the compressive modulus of the cage   MG-63 cells, and the cytotoxicity was more pronounced
            was positively correlated with the number of crossing   with increasing sample amounts. This indicates that the
            layers of the beams, i.e., as the number of crossing layers   PCL  raw  materials  used  in  this  study  are  not  suitable





























                                 Figure 9. Compressive modulus of distinct degradation phases of each group of cages.


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       182                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1996
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195