Page 192 - IJB-10-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Effects of structure on the interbody cage

Funding fusion: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Spine.
2020;45(12):E729-E741.
This work is supported by Beijing Natural Science doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003372
Foundation (L212047) and National Natural Science 5. Geisinger JR, Park DK. Allograft bone: uses in spinal surgery.
Foundation of China (52171149), under the projects of Semin Spine Surg. 2016;28(4):190-195.
“Research on the Mechanism of 3D Printing Degradable doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2016.08.002
Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage’s Osteogenic Activity” and
“Basic research on amorphous nanocrystalline magnetic 6. Rao PJ, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ. Spine
powder 3D direct printing technology based on polymer interbody implants: material selection and modification,
bonding and its application,” respectively. functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve
osseointegration: bioactivation of spine interbody implant
surfaces. Orthop Surg. 2014;6(2):81-89.
Conflict of interest doi: 10.1111/os.12098
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. 7. Yin X. Application of biodegradable 3D-printed cage for
cervical diseases via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Author contributions (ACDF): an in vitro biomechanical study. Biotechnol Lett.
2017;39(9):1433-1439.
Conceptualization: Zhiwei Jiao, Haibo Zou doi: 10.1007/s10529-017-2367-5
Data curation: Zhiwei Jiao
Investigation: Pengfei Chi, Hanlin Zou, Hao Liu, Dong Chen 8. Chen Y, Wang X, Lu X, et al. Comparison of titanium and
Methodology: Zhiwei Jiao, Pengfei Chi, Yuan Yu polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment
Project Administration: Haibo Zou, Weimin Yang of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective,
randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up. Eur
Visualization: Pengfei Chi, Zhiwei Jiao Spine J. 2013;22(7):1539-1546.
Writing – original draft: Pengfei Chi doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2772-y
Writing – review & editing: Zhiwei Jiao, Yuan Yu
9. Karikari IO, Jain D, Owens TR, et al. Impact of subsidence on
Ethics approval and consent to participate clinical outcomes and radiographic fusion rates in anterior
cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review. J Spinal
Not applicable. Disord Tech. 2014;27(1):1-10.
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825bd26d
Consent for publication 10. Cuzzocrea F, Ivone A, Jannelli E, et al. PEEK versus metal cages
Not applicable. in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiological
comparative study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2019;103(3):237-241.
Availability of data doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0580-6
11. Hasegawa T, Ushirozako H, Shigeto E, et al. The titanium-
Data are available from the corresponding author upon coated PEEK cage maintains better bone fusion with the
reasonable request. endplate than the PEEK cage 6 months after PLIF surgery:
a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Spine.
References 2020;45(15):E892-E902.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003464
1. Verma R, Virk S, Qureshi S. Interbody fusions in the lumbar
spine: a review. HSS J. 2020;16(2):162-167. 12. Laubach M, Kobbe P, Hutmacher DW. Biodegradable
doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09737-4 interbody cages for lumbar spine fusion: current concepts
and future directions. Biomaterials. 2022;288:121699.
2. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121699
interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison 13. Koutserimpas C, Alpantaki K, Chatzinikolaidou M,
of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, Chlouverakis G, Dohm M, Hadjipavlou AG. The effectiveness
OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2-18. of biodegradable instrumentation in the treatment of spinal
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05
fractures. Injury. 2018;49(12):2111-2120.
3. Vaccaro AR, Chiba K, Heller JG, et al. Bone grafting doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.008
alternatives in spinal surgery. Spine J. 2002;2(3):206-215.
doi: 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00180-8 14. Daskalakis E, Liu F, Huang B, et al. Investigating the
influence of architecture and material composition of 3D
4. Liu S, Wang Y, Liang Z, Zhou M, Chen C. Comparative printed anatomical design scaffolds for large bone defects.
clinical effectiveness and safety of bone morphogenetic Int J Bioprint. 2021;7(2):268.
protein versus autologous iliac crest bone graft in lumbar doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i2.268

Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 184 doi: 10.36922/ijb.1996