Page 255 - IJB-10-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Cell viability in printing structured inks

Figure 3. Contour of wall shear stress and pressure for 2-symmetric ink-based printing, 4-symmetric ink-based printing, and corresponding conventional
printing. (A) Contour of wall shear stress and pressure of domain in phase 1 in 2-symmetric ink-based printing. (B) Contour of wall shear stress and
pressure of domain in phase 2 in 2-symmetric ink-based printing. (C) Contour of wall shear stress in 4-symmetric ink-based printing. (D) Contour of
wall shear stress in conventional printing using ink 1. (E) Contour of wall shear stress in conventional printing using ink 2. (F) Contour of pressure in
4-symmetric ink-based printing. (G) Contour of pressure in conventional printing using ink 1. (H) Contour of pressure in conventional printing using ink 2.

Figure 4. Comparison of fluid average pressure, maximum pressure, average shear stress, and maximum shear stress in 2-symmetric and 4-symmetric ink-
based printing, along with their corresponding conventional printing processes. (A) Comparison of average pressure at different cross-section positions.
(B) Comparison of maximum pressure at different cross-section positions. (C) Comparison of average shear stress at different cross-section positions. (D)
Comparison of maximum shear stress at different cross-section positions.

Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 247 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2362