Page 257 - IJB-10-4
P. 257

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   Cell viability in printing structured inks




            printing was 3.046e+1 Pa (Figure S10B in Supplementary   Emphasis was placed on vessels at material phase 2 (Figure
            File). Although the averages of these two printing methods   S2 in Supplementary File). Consistent with the geometric
            are comparable, the maximum shear stress at the nozzle tip   parameters in the three-layer vessels, we exclusively
            is distinctly different. In vascular-like ink-based printing,   considered cases involving identical biomaterial inks
            the maximum shear stress was 2.069e+2 Pa, which was   with varying cells loaded with corresponding material
            significantly lower than the wall shear stress produced in   phases.  Subsequently,  employing  the  bisection  method,
            conventional printing of 3.657e+4 Pa.              we evaluated the cross-sectional structure of fibers with
                                                               the defined ratio at the nozzle outlet, extruded by hepatic
            3.3. Advantages of structured ink-based printing for   lobule analogue-like inks. Average and maximum pressures
            hepatic lobule tissue engineering                  within nozzle domains for phase 2, along with average
            Engineering hepatic lobule tissues for medical applications   and maximum shear stress at the wall corresponding to
            is an imperative endeavor, given the pivotal role of   nozzle domains for phase 2 and material phase interfaces
            hepatic lobules in maintaining blood glucose balance and   between material phase 1 and phase 2, as well as between
            promoting metabolism.  The intermediate layer  of the   phase 2 and phase 3, were determined. These results were
                               44
                                                   45
            hepatic lobule contains a diverse network of blood vessels   then compared with those obtained from conventional
            crucial for sustaining liver function. Conventional E3DP   printing processes.
            methods  commonly utilize multiple nozzles to construct
                   46
            structures that mimic hepatic lobules. We explored    In the same manner, the method of controlling variables
            hepatic  lobule  analogue-like  structures  with  specific   and the bisection method were employed to determine the
                                              ′
                                                     ′
                                                 ′
            size parameters, where  the ratio of  rtor to r  was   cross-sectional size parameters of extruded fiber structures
                                             5
                                                 4
                                                     3
            maintained at 2:2:1 (Figure S1B in Supplementary File).   corresponding to  the hepatic  lobule analogue-like  inks.






































            Figure 7. Examination of fluid average pressure, maximum pressure, average shear stress, and maximum shear stress in vascular-like ink-based printing.
            (A) Fluid average and maximum pressure within nozzles using varying values of r . (B) Fluid average and maximum pressure within nozzles using varying
                                                               1
            values of r . (C) Fluid average and maximum shear stress in the wall and varying material phase interfaces using varying values of r . (D) Fluid average and
                                                                                              1
                  2
            maximum shear stress in the wall and varying material phase interfaces using varying values of r .
                                                                         2
            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       249                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2362
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262