Page 502 - IJB-10-4
P. 502

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   3D-printed variable stiffness scaffolds




            2.2. Scaffold design
            To develop an appropriate 3D architecture for the meniscus
            scaffold, 10 × 10 × 2 mm porous PCL scaffolds were                                             (I)
            3D printed with varying fiber spacing and offsets. Two
            different fiber spacings (1 and 2 mm) and three different
            offsets  (0  offset,  1  offset,  2  offsets)  were  investigated  in                          (II)
            this  study  (Figure  1).  The  printed  scaffolds  had  fibers
            alternating 90° between each layer. The effect of double-
            printing layers was also investigated, whereby the same
            fiber orientation was printed twice and then alternated
            90°. Fiber spacing was defined as the distance between the                                    (III)
            edges of each strand. Scaffold formation was characterized
            using an optical microscope (Olympus, Japan).
            2.3. Porosity of the printed scaffolds
            The theoretical porosity of the scaffolds was calculated   where V is the volume of one cell and V  is the solid
                                                                        cell
                                                                                                  fiber
            using a cell within the scaffold, employing the following   fibers in the cell; L is the length and W is the width of the
            geometry-based equation derived from the void space   cell; and D is the diameter of the fiber and is twice the
            between fibers and their cross-sectional area:     height of the cell.















































            Figure 1. Image depicting 12 designs printed using polycaprolactone (PCL). Straight blue lines indicate layers on the x-axis. Circles illustrate the layer
            printed at 90° to the previous layer. Green layers highlight the offsets present.


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       494                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3784
   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507