Page 572 - IJB-10-4
P. 572
International Journal of Bioprinting Light-based muscle bioprinting with bioglass
44. Ogneva IV, Lebedev DV, Shenkman BS. Transversal stiffness doi: 10.1039/D3SM00560G
and Young’s modulus of single fibers from rat soleus 47. Gao H, Xiao J, Wei Y, Wang H, Wan H, Liu S. Regulation
muscle probed by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J. of myogenic differentiation by topologically microgrooved
2010;98(3):418-424. surfaces for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. ACS Omega.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.028 2021;6(32):20931-20940.
45. Collinsworth AM, Zhang S, Kraus WE, Truskey GA. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02347
Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle 48. Wu C, Chin CSM, Huang Q, et al. Rapid nanomolding of
cells throughout differentiation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. nanotopography on flexible substrates to control muscle
2002;283(4):C1219-C1227. cell growth with enhanced maturation. Microsyst Nanoeng.
doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00502.2001 2021;7(1):1-15.
46. Elvitigala KCML, Mubarok W, Sakai S. Tuning the doi: 10.1038/s41378-021-00316-4
crosslinking and degradation of hyaluronic acid/gelatin 49. Yu K, Zhang X, Sun Y, et al. Printability during projection-
hydrogels using hydrogen peroxide for muscle cell sheet based 3D bioprinting. Bioact Mater. 2022;11:254-267.
fabrication. Soft Matter. 2023;19(31):5880-5887. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.021
Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 564 doi: 10.36922/ijb.1830

