Page 574 - IJB-10-4
P. 574

International Journal of Bioprinting                      3D-printing silicone patient-specific soft-tissue expander




            implants in patients with severe bone atrophy. Several gingival   easier and permits more bone gain, both horizontally and
            periosteal-releasing techniques for tension-free  wound   vertically (Figure 1). 2,3
            closure have been developed,  but these techniques may lead   Current hydrogel self-inflating expanders have
                                  1
            to insufficient keratinized gingival tissue, flat vestibular depth,   several  different preformed  sizes  and shapes.  However,
            and compromise the prognosis of dental endosseous implants.
            For example, secondary vestibuloplasty is commonly   the morphology of bone defects is highly individualized,
            performed for gingival grafts, but the patient may require a   and not all preformed expanders meet the desired final
            long-term treatment course and multiple surgeries. 1  morphology. Moreover, the volume increase is not
                                                               comparable to the increase in soft-tissue surface. Research
               A soft-tissue expander increases the tissue surface for   has revealed that the round expander has the largest amount
            reconstruction and is frequently used in plastic surgeries,   of fractional area gain followed by square, rectangular,
            such as breast augmentation and scar revision (e.g., burn   and crescent-shaped expanders under the same pressure
            injury or skin tumor excision). The traditional soft-tissue   applied on the same surface area.  It would be ideal if
                                                                                           4
            expander is a silicon shell with a port (embedded under   the increase in final surface area could be defined in the
            the cutaneous tissue) for saline injection. Progressive skin   pre-expansion stage, and the area gain fraction would no
            inflation is accomplished by saline injection through the   longer be an issue for gingival tissue expansion.
            port. This injection system is not feasible for small and
            thin intraoral gingival tissues, leading to the development   A good patient-specific soft-tissue expander must be
            of the first self-inflated expander in 2007. In the expander,   designed according to the geometric shape of the bone
            the hydrogel is introduced into a silicon shell that absorbs   defect to maximize the contact area between the expander
            body fluid to expand spontaneously. The self-inflated soft-  and bone defect hard tissue. It should gradually expand
            tissue expander expands the gingival tissue surface before   without damaging the soft tissues to meet clinical needs.
            bone augmentation and wound closure. This approach is   Consequently, the expander material, the expansion agent









































            Figure 1. Bone defects and their management with soft-tissue expanders: (a, top) computed tomography (CT) image of a patient’s mandible with left bone
            defect (red circle); (a, bottom) image reconstruction model and position of the bone defect; (b) illustration of a self-inflating soft-tissue expander and
            subsequent bone augmentation and dental implantation.


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       566                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2918
   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579