Page 67 - IJB-10-4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting in otorhinolaryngology

171. Moon JH, Kim EH, Kim SH. Various modifications of a 182. Hu Q, Cui J, Zhang H, Liu S, Ramalingam M. A 5 + 1-axis
vascularized nasoseptal flap for repair of extensive skull base 3D printing platform for producing customized intestinal
dural defects. J Neurosurg. 2019;132(2):371-379. fistula stents. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023;10(5):955-970.
doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS181556 doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0044
172. Kayastha D, Wiznia D, Manes RP, Omay SB, Khoury T, 183. Nyirjesy SC, Judd RT, Alfayez Y, et al. Use of 3-dimensional
Rimmer R. 3D printing for virtual surgical planning of printing at the point-of-care to manage a complex wound in
nasoseptal flap skull-base reconstruction: a proof-of-concept hemifacial necrotizing fasciitis: a case report. 3D Print Med.
study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023;13(11):2073-2075. 2023;9(1):4.
doi: 10.1002/alr.23165 doi: 10.1186/s41205-022-00166-4
173. Deruyver L, Rigaut C, Lambert P, Haut B, Goole J. The 184. Arens C, Schwemmle C, Voigt-Zimmermann S.
importance of pre-formulation studies and of 3D-printed Surgical reconstruction in laryngeal carcinoma. HNO.
nasal casts in the success of a pharmaceutical product 2020;68(9):666-677.
intended for nose-to-brain delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00916-y
2021;175:113826. 185. Kahmke R, Sajisevi M. Larynx cancer: reconstructive
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113826
options. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2023;56(2):333-343.
174. Goyanes A, Det-Amornrat U, Wang J, Basit AW, Gaisford doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2022.11.002
S. 3D scanning and 3D printing as innovative technologies 186. Tian H, Gao S, Yu J, et al. Application of digital modeling
for fabricating personalized topical drug delivery systems. J and three-dimensional printing of titanium mesh for
Control Release. 2016;234:41-48. reconstruction of thyroid cartilage in partial laryngectomy.
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.034
Acta Otolaryngol. 2022;142(3-4):363-368.
175. Djupesland PG, Messina JC, Palmer JN. Deposition of drugs doi: 10.1080/00016489.2022.2055138
in the nose and sinuses with an exhalation delivery system vs 187. Celik H, Krug E, Zhang CR, et al. A humanized animal
conventional nasal spray or high-volume irrigation in Draf II/ model predicts clonal evolution and therapeutic
III post-surgical anatomy. Rhinology. 2020;58(2):175-183. vulnerabilities in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer
doi: 10.4193/Rhin18.304
Discov. 2021;11(12):3126-3141.
176. Ciavarella D, Campobasso A, Conte E, et al. Correlation doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1652
between dental arch form and OSA severity in adult patients:
an observational study. Prog Orthod. 2023;24(1):19. 188. Fan H, Demirci U, Chen P. Emerging organoid models:
doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00464-5 leaping forward in cancer research. J Hematol Oncol.
2019;12(1):142.
177. Kecik D. Three-dimensional analyses of palatal morphology doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0832-4
and its relation to upper airway area in obstructive sleep
apnea. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(2):300-306. 189. Almela T, Tayebi L, Moharamzadeh K. 3D bioprinting for
doi: 10.2319/051116-377.1 in vitro models of oral cancer: toward development and
validation. Bioprinting. 2021;22:e00132.
178. Chi AC, Day TA, Neville BW. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00132
squamous cell carcinoma--an update. CA Cancer J Clin.
2015;65(5):401-421. 190. Langer EM, Allen-Petersen BL, King SM, et al. Modeling
doi: 10.3322/caac.21293 tumor phenotypes in vitro with three-dimensional
bioprinting. Cell Rep. 2019;26(3):608-623.e6.
179. Xu J, Lai F, Liu Y, et al. Novel computer-aided reconstruction doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.090
of soft tissue defects following resection of oral and
oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg 191. Vimawala S, Gao T, Goldfarb J, et al. Initial experience
Oncol. 2022;20(1):196. using 3-dimensional printed models for head and neck
doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02654-7 reconstruction in Haiti. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022;101(3):
NP89-NP91.
180. Bhattacharyya A, Janarthanan G, Kim T, et al. Modulation doi: 10.1177/0145561320938920
of bioactive calcium phosphate micro/nanoparticle size
and shape during in situ synthesis of photo-crosslinkable 192. Richard Z, Jackson E, Jung JP, Kanotra SP. Feasibility and
gelatin methacryloyl based nanocomposite hydrogels potential of three-dimensional printing in laryngotracheal
for 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering. Biomater Res. stenosis. J Laryngol Otol. 2019;133(6):530-534.
2022;26(1):54. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119001208
doi: 10.1186/s40824-022-00301-6 193. Furlow PW, Mathisen DJ. Surgical anatomy of the trachea.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7(2):255-260.
181. Macielak RJ, Ziebarth MT, Price DL. 3D printed fistula plug:
a novel bridge to definitive reconstruction. Laryngoscope. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.03.01
2021;131(1):111-114. 194. Sun Y, Huo Y, Ran X, et al. Instant trachea reconstruction
doi: 10.1002/lary.28563 using 3D-bioprinted C-shape biomimetic trachea based

Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 59 doi: 10.36922/ijb.3006