Page 137 - IJB-5-1
P. 137
Hernandez-Quintanar and Rodriguez-Salvador
2. Hull, C W, 1984, Apparatus for Production of Three- Measurements, 990302. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2218698.
Dimensional Objects by Stereolithography. Patent Number. 16. Zhao Z, Zhou X, Shen S, et al., 2016, 3D Printing Of Tissue-
US4575330A. UVP Inc. Simulating Phantoms For Calibration Of Biomedical Optical
3. Ventola C L, 2014, Medical applications for 3D printing: Devices. SPIE/COS Photonics Asia, 10024: 10024N1-
Current and projected uses. Pharm Ther, 39(10): 704–711. 10024N10. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2246273.
4. 3D Printing.com, 2018, What is 3D Printing? Available 17. Diep P, Pannem S, Sweer J, et al., 2015, Three-dimensional
from: https://www.3dprinting.com/what-is-3d-printing. [Last printed optical phantoms with customized absorption and
accessed on 2018 Nov 14]. scattering properties. Biomed Opt Express, 6(11): 4212–4220.
5. Radenkovic D, Solouk A, Seifalian A, 2016, Personalized https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.6.004212.
development of human organs using 3D printing technology. 18. Marcu L, Boppart S A, Hutchinson M R, et al., 2017,
Med Hypotheses, 87: 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Biophotonics: The big picture. J Biomed Opt, 23(2): 21103.
mehy.2015.12.017. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.2.021103.
6. Jürgen G, Thomas B, Torsten B, et al., 2016, Biofabrication: 19. Andreu N, Zelmer A, Wiles S, 2011, Noninvasive
Reappraising the definition of an evolving field. biophotonic imaging for studies of infectious disease. FEMS
Biofabrication, 8(1): 13001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758- Microbiol Rev, 35: 360–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-
5090/8/1/013001. 6976.2010.00252.x.
7. Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinting 20. Maloth K N, Velpula N, Kodangal S, et al., 2016,
for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 34(4): 422– Photodynamic therapy a non-invasive treatment modality for
434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011. precancerous lesions. J Lasers Med Sci, 7: 30–36. https://doi.
8. Huang Y, Zhang X F, Gao G, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting and org/10.15171/jlms.2016.07.
the current applications in tissue engineering. Biotechnol J, 21. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation
12(8): 1600734. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600734. Protection, 2017, ICNIRP statement on diagnostic devices
9. Lee J M, Sing S L, Zhou M, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting using non-ionizing radiation: Existing regulations and
processes: A perspective on classification and terminology. Int J potential health risks. Health Phys, 112(3): 305–321. https://
Bioprint, 4(2): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i2.151. doi.org/10.1097/hp.0000000000000654.
10. Ozbolat I T, Peng W, Ozbolat V, 2016, Application areas of 22. Pogue B W, Patterson M S, 2006, Review of tissue
3D bioprinting. Drug Disc Today, 21(8): 1257–1271. https:// simulating phantoms for optical spectroscopy, imaging
doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.006. and dosimetry. J Biomed Opt, 11(4): 041102. https://doi.
11. Rodríguez-Salvador M, Rio-Belver R M, Garechana- org/10.1117/1.2335429.
Anacabe G, 2017, Scientometric and patentometric analyses 23. Gao F, Li J, Zhang L, et al., 2010, Simultaneous fluorescence
to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative yield and lifetime tomography from time-resolved
technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting. PLoS One, 12(6): transmittances of small-animal-sized phantom. Appl Opt,
e0180375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180375. 49(16): 3163–3172. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.49.003163.
12. Murphy S V, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of 24. Wang L V, 2008, Prospects of photoacoustic tomography. Med
tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32: 773–785. Phys, 35(12): 5758–5767. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3013698.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958. 25. Nordstrom R J, 2011, Phantoms as Standards in Optical
13. Wang M, Shen S, Yang J, et al., 2014, 3D Printing Method Measurements, Proceedings SPIE 7906, Optical Diagnostics
For Freeform Fabrication Of Optical Phantoms Simulating and Sensing XI: Toward Point-of-Care Diagnostics; and
Heterogeneous Biological Tissue. SPIE BiOS, 8945: 8945091- Design and Performance Validation of Phantoms Used in
8945099. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2041137. Conjunction with Optical Measurement of Tissue III. https://
14. Zhao S, Gu Y, Xue P, et al., 2010, Imaging port wine stains doi.org/10.1117/12.876374.
by fiber optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt, 15(3): 26. Lamouche G, Kennedy B F, Kennedy K M, et al., 2012,
36020. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3445712. Review of tissue simulating phantoms with controllable
15. Dong E, Wang M, Shen S, et al., 2016, 3D Printing of Tissue- optical, mechanical and structural properties for use in optical
Simulating Phantoms as a Traceable Standard for Biomedical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express, 3(6): 1381–
Optical Measurement. Proc. SPIE 9903:9903021-99030213, 1398. https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.3.001381.
Seventh International Symposium on Precision Mechanical 27. Bouchard J, Noiseux I, Veilleux I, et al., 2011, The role
International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1 9

