Page 68 - IJB-5-1
P. 68

Mechanisms and modeling of electrohydrodynamic phenomena
           Table 2. A summary of theoretical models for three phenomena under different assumptions, and their advantages and disadvantages
           Phenomenon       Theories or models  Assumption and conditions  Advantages       Disadvantages
           Conical meniscus  Taylor          Semi-vertical angle of cone is   Obtaining critical voltage   Semi-angle is not always
                            electrohydrostatic   49.3°; Pressure is zero; Neglected   value for jet emission from the   49.3°; Approximate 10%
                            model (Taylor cone)  weight of the liquid cone  tip of the cone  difference from the critical
                                                                                            voltage of experiment
           Cone-jet transition  Leaky dielectric model;   Penetration of electric field lines   Described operating diagram   Only for leaky dielectric
                            Surface couple model  into liquid; Appearance of surface   of cone-jet for inks with   material and stable cone-jet
                                             electric charges         partial electrical conductivity  mode; Complexity in a
                                                                                            mathematical method
           Stability of a long and   One-dimensional model  Tangential stress caused by electric   Identified three instability   Inaccurate in low viscosity
           slender jet                       field must be much smaller than the   modes based on electric   and/or imperfect conductor
                                             radial viscous stress; Wavelength   field strength; Represented   jet
                                             of the perturbation is much smaller   operating diagram of varicose
                                             than the characteristic decay length   and whipping instability
                                             of the jet               thresholds

                         A                                     B
















                                     C


















           Figure 6. (A) Growth rate σ versus the wavenumber k for a jet with b (distance between two radial electrodes) >>1, χ = 0.6, C (Ohnesorge
           number) = 1, and β (liquid relative permittivity) = 2 and several values of the relaxation parameter α; (B) Growth rate σ versus the
           wavenumber k for a jet with different values of the Ohnesorge number C (b >>1, α=1, β=1, χ=0.6). (C) Growth rate σ versus the wave
           number k for a jet with b>>1 and b=2. The other parameters are fixed at C=1, α=1, and β=2. Several values of the electrification number χ
           are plotted [81].  Adapted by permission from Jose Lopez-Herrera et al. (2005) under the AIP Publishing LLC.


           and  may  promote  longer  liquid  jets  with  moderate                   ργ  . 05              (30)
           viscosity in the non-whipping jet regime for an imperfect         C = µ /(  r)
           conductor .                                           Viscosity does not change the stability limits, but
                   [81]
             The  effects  of  the  viscosity  can  be  reflected  by   it lowers the growth rate of any perturbation. The most
           comparing  growth curves having different Ohnesorge   unstable wavelength becomes longer with an increase of
           numbers,  C,  defined  as  a  ratio  of  viscous  forces  to   Ohnesorge number in Figure 6B, whereas the growth rate
           capillary forces,                                   decreases .  A narrow interfacial boundary layer with
                                                                      [81]

           14                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73