Page 70 - IJB-5-1
P. 70
Mechanisms and modeling of electrohydrodynamic phenomena
resolution experimentally. It is known that a stable jet and comments. J Aerosol Sci, 31: 97–120. https://doi.
is a prerequisite condition for acquiring high printing org/10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00036-1.
resolution, but the theoretical prediction of jet stability 11. Gary S, 1732, A letter concerning the electricity of water,
still remains to be a difficulty. Understanding of this from Mr.Stephen Gray to cromwell Mortimer, M.D. Secr.R.S.
physical process requires more systematical studies on Philos Trans, 37: 227–260.
the formation of a stable cone-jet.
3D high-resolution printing as one of an important 12. Rayleigh L, 1879, XX. On the equilibrium of liquid conducting
branch of EHD family is rising rapidly in recent ten years. masses charged with electricity. Philos Mag Ser, 14(87):
In contrast to deposition in a small area by electrospray 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786448208628425.
or thinning and bending process by electrospinning, high- 13. Zeleny J, 1917, Instability of electrified liquid surfaces. Phys
resolution EHD printing can generate single droplet or Rev, 10(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.10.1.
continuous line at single micro-scale. Designs and recent 14. Marginean L P, Heffernan L, Vertes A, 2004, Flexing the
applications of EHD 3D printing will be discussed in the electrified meniscus the birth of a jet in electrosprays. Anal
next paper due to length limitation.
Chem, 76: 4202–4207. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac049817r.
References 15. Allan R S, Mason S G, 1962, Particle behaviour in shear and
electric fields I. Deformation and burst of fluid drops. Proc R
1. Onses M S, Sutanto E, Ferreira P M, et al., 2015, Soc London, 267: 45–61.
Mechanisms, capabilities, and applications of high-resolution 16. Saville D A, 1997, Electrohydrodynamics-the taylor-melcher
electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Small J, 11(34): 4237– leaky dielectric model. Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 29: 27–64.
4266. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201500593; https://doi. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.27.
org/10.1002/smll.201570209. 17. Taylor G, 1969, Electrically driven jets. Proc R Soc London,
2. Korkut S, Saville D A, Aksay I A, 2008, Collodial cluster 313: 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1969.0205.
arrays by electrohydrodynamic printing. Langmuir, 18. Cloupeau M, Prunet-Foch B, 1994, Electrohydrodynamic
24: 12196–12201. https://doi.org/10.1021/la8023327. spraying functioning modes a critical review. J Aerosol
3. Chrisey D B, 2000, Materials processing: The power of Sci, 25: 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-
direct writing. Science, 289(5481): 879–881. https://doi. 8502(94)90199-6.
org/10.1126/science.289.5481.879. 19. Marginean I, Nemes P, Vertes A, 2007, Astable regime in
4. Jaworek A, Sobczyk A, 2008, Electrospraying route to electrosprays. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 76(2
nanotechnology: An overview. J Electrostat, 66(3–4): 197– Pt 2): 26320. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.026320.
219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001. 20. Juraschek R, Rollgen F W, 1998, Pulsation phenomena during
5. Chen C H, 2011, Electrohydrodynamic Stability. Vienna: electrospray ionization. Int J Mass Spectrom, 177: 1–15.
Springer. p177–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091- https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(98)14025-3.
0900-7_6. 21. Fenn J B, Mann M, Meng C K, et al., 1989, Electrospray ionization
6. Park J U, Hardy M, Kang S J, et al., 2007, High–resolution for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Am Assoc Adv Sci,
electrohydrodynamic jet printing. Nat Mater, 6(10): 782– 246: 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2675315.
789. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1974. 22. Gamero-Castaño M, Aguirre-de-Carcer I, Juan L D, et al.,
7. Liang H, He J, Chang J, et al., 2017, Coaxial nozzle–assisted 1998, On the current emitted by Taylor cone-jets of electrolytes
electrohydrodynamic printing for microscale 3D cell– in vacuo: Implications for liquid metal ion sources. J Appl
laden constructs. Int J Bioprinting, 4(1): 127. https://doi. Phys, 83(5): 2428–2434. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367002.
org/10.18063/ijb.v4i1.127. 23. Morozov V N, Morozova T Y, 1999, Electrospray
8. Liu H, Vijayavenkataraman S, Wang D, et al., 2017, deposition as a method for mass fabrication of mono-and
Influence of electrohydrodynamic jetting parameters on the multicomponent microarrays of biological and biologically
morphology of PCL scaffolds. Int J Bioprinting, 3(1):72-82. active substances. Anal Chem, 71: 3110–3117. https://doi.
https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.009. org/10.1021/ac981412h.
9. Gilbert W, 1893, De Magnete Book. New York: John Wiley 24. Yogi O, Kawakami T, Yamauchi M, et al., 2001, On-demand
and Sons. droplet spotter for preparing pico-to femtoliter droplets on
10. Forbes R G, 2000, Liquid–metal ion sources and electrosprays surfaces. Anal Chem, 73: 1896–1902. https://doi.org/10.1021/
operating in cone–jet mode some theoretical comparisons ac0012039.
16 International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1

