Page 70 - IJB-5-1
P. 70

Mechanisms and modeling of electrohydrodynamic phenomena
           resolution experimentally. It is known that a stable jet   and comments.  J Aerosol Sci, 31: 97–120. https://doi.
           is a prerequisite condition  for acquiring  high printing   org/10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00036-1.
           resolution, but the theoretical prediction of jet stability   11.  Gary S, 1732, A letter  concerning the electricity  of water,
           still  remains  to  be  a  difficulty.  Understanding  of  this   from Mr.Stephen Gray to cromwell Mortimer, M.D. Secr.R.S.
           physical process requires more systematical  studies on   Philos Trans, 37: 227–260.
           the formation of a stable cone-jet.
             3D high-resolution printing as one of an important   12.  Rayleigh L, 1879, XX. On the equilibrium of liquid conducting
           branch of EHD family is rising rapidly in recent ten years.   masses  charged  with  electricity.  Philos  Mag  Ser,  14(87):
           In contrast to deposition in a small area by electrospray   184–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786448208628425.
           or thinning and bending process by electrospinning, high-  13.  Zeleny J, 1917, Instability of electrified liquid surfaces. Phys
           resolution EHD printing can generate single droplet or   Rev, 10(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.10.1.
           continuous line at single micro-scale. Designs and recent   14.  Marginean L P, Heffernan L,  Vertes A, 2004, Flexing the
           applications of EHD 3D printing will be discussed in the   electrified meniscus the birth of a jet in electrosprays. Anal
           next paper due to length limitation.
                                                                   Chem, 76: 4202–4207. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac049817r.
           References                                          15.  Allan R S, Mason S G, 1962, Particle behaviour in shear and
                                                                   electric fields I. Deformation and burst of fluid drops. Proc R
           1.   Onses M S, Sutanto E, Ferreira P M,  et al., 2015,   Soc London, 267: 45–61.
               Mechanisms, capabilities, and applications of high-resolution   16.  Saville D A, 1997, Electrohydrodynamics-the taylor-melcher
               electrohydrodynamic  jet printing.  Small J, 11(34): 4237–  leaky  dielectric  model.  Ann  Rev  Fluid  Mech,  29: 27–64.
               4266. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201500593; https://doi.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.27.
               org/10.1002/smll.201570209.                     17.  Taylor G, 1969, Electrically driven jets. Proc R Soc London,
           2.   Korkut S, Saville D A, Aksay I A, 2008, Collodial cluster   313: 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1969.0205.
               arrays by electrohydrodynamic  printing.  Langmuir,   18.  Cloupeau M, Prunet-Foch B, 1994, Electrohydrodynamic
               24: 12196–12201. https://doi.org/10.1021/la8023327.  spraying  functioning  modes  a  critical  review.  J Aerosol
           3.   Chrisey D B, 2000, Materials processing:  The power of   Sci,  25:  1021–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-
               direct  writing.  Science, 289(5481):  879–881. https://doi.  8502(94)90199-6.
               org/10.1126/science.289.5481.879.               19.  Marginean  I, Nemes  P,  Vertes A, 2007, Astable regime  in
           4.   Jaworek  A, Sobczyk  A, 2008, Electrospraying  route to   electrosprays. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 76(2
               nanotechnology: An overview. J Electrostat, 66(3–4): 197–  Pt 2): 26320. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.026320.
               219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001.  20.  Juraschek R, Rollgen F W, 1998, Pulsation phenomena during
           5.   Chen C H, 2011,  Electrohydrodynamic  Stability. Vienna:   electrospray ionization.  Int J Mass  Spectrom,  177: 1–15.
               Springer. p177–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(98)14025-3.
               0900-7_6.                                       21.  Fenn J B, Mann M, Meng C K, et al., 1989, Electrospray ionization
           6.   Park J U, Hardy M, Kang S J, et al., 2007, High–resolution   for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Am Assoc Adv Sci,
               electrohydrodynamic  jet printing.  Nat Mater, 6(10): 782–  246: 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2675315.
               789. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1974.          22.  Gamero-Castaño M, Aguirre-de-Carcer I, Juan L D, et al.,
           7.   Liang H, He J, Chang J, et al., 2017, Coaxial nozzle–assisted   1998, On the current emitted by Taylor cone-jets of electrolytes
               electrohydrodynamic  printing for microscale  3D cell–  in vacuo: Implications for liquid metal ion sources. J Appl
               laden constructs.  Int J Bioprinting, 4(1): 127. https://doi.  Phys, 83(5): 2428–2434. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367002.
               org/10.18063/ijb.v4i1.127.                      23.  Morozov  V  N, Morozova  T  Y,  1999, Electrospray
           8.   Liu  H,  Vijayavenkataraman  S,  Wang  D,  et al., 2017,   deposition  as a  method  for mass fabrication  of mono-and
               Influence of electrohydrodynamic jetting parameters on the   multicomponent  microarrays  of biological  and  biologically
               morphology of PCL scaffolds. Int J Bioprinting, 3(1):72-82.   active  substances.  Anal Chem, 71: 3110–3117. https://doi.
               https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.009.           org/10.1021/ac981412h.
           9.   Gilbert W, 1893, De Magnete Book. New York: John Wiley   24.  Yogi O, Kawakami T, Yamauchi M, et al., 2001, On-demand
               and Sons.                                           droplet spotter for preparing pico-to femtoliter  droplets on
           10.  Forbes R G, 2000, Liquid–metal ion sources and electrosprays   surfaces. Anal Chem, 73: 1896–1902. https://doi.org/10.1021/
               operating in cone–jet mode some theoretical  comparisons   ac0012039.

           16                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75