Page 230 - IJB-10-5
P. 230

International Journal of Bioprinting                                        Effect of ingredient flow speed









































            Figure 3. Effect of nozzle geometry on (A) time taken for extrusion, (B) mass of mashed potato (MP) food ink extruded, and (C) mass flow rate of
            food inks.


            the MP food inks was relatively constant at 0.57 when the   speed does not affect the extrusion rate in dot volume
            extruded volume was greater than 20 mL. Therefore, the   extrusion.
            geometry of the nozzle affects the food extrusion process
            but only at low-volume extrusion. The 4.0-mm  nozzle   3.3. 3D printing using model extrusion
            was subsequently used throughout this research unless   3.3.1. Effect of printing speed on the width of the
            specified otherwise.                               printed line
            3.2.2. Effect of ingredient flow speed on extrusion time  One of the main objectives of this paper is to study the
            To determine if there was any effect of the printing   effects of the control parameter on the print resolution.
            process parameters on the extrusion time, dot extrusion   One of the said parameters is the printing speed, which
            experiments were conducted with different printing process   refers to the speed of the nozzle head on the horizontal
            parameters. When dot extrusion occurs at a fixed point   axis. Results revealed that at constant ingredient flow
            (i.e., the center of the dish without translational movement   speed, there were some variations between the printing
            in the x- and y-axes), the printing speed is considered zero.   speed in the Foodini advanced user settings and the actual
            However, it was discovered that ingredient flow speed   printing speed (Table 2). The printing speed displayed in
            does not affect the printing time, albeit printing speed is a   Foodini was significantly higher compared to the actual
            variable in Equation (IX) (discussed later). This is evident   printing speed. One possible reason is that the slicer in the
            from the experimental results (Figure 4), where the time   Foodini Creator hub uses the speed acquired directly from
            taken for each material extrusion at each dot volume (1–50   the electric motor, which considers other functions of the
            mL) was the same at different ingredient flow speeds (Table   printer, thereby resulting in a higher printing speed. Despite
            S2, Supporting Information). One possible reason for this   the differences in printing speed, the effect of printing
            occurrence is that dot extrusion does not require slicing,   speed on the resolution was still studied as the actual
            thereby suggesting that the printing process parameters   printing speed would increase when the printing speed in
            do not affect the extrusion process. Thus, ingredient flow   Foodini increases. In Figure 5A and B, the average width
                                                               of the 3D-printed line remained relatively constant at 4.4


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       222                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2787
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235