Page 235 - IJB-10-5
P. 235

International Journal of Bioprinting                                        Effect of ingredient flow speed




            flow speed V  is defined as a ratio between the total length   the assumption that the printing process parameters are
                      IFS
            required based on the material’s rheological properties L   truly independent variables and work similarly to typical
            and the length required based on the design of the model E   3D food printers. However, this is not the case as the
            (Equation [V]). An increase or decrease in L would lead to   printing process parameter does not operate in a way that
            a linear change in the ingredient flow speed, which affects   conforms to this logic. Thus, the factorial design to find
            the amount of material extruded subsequently. Based   out the interaction between the controllable variables (V
                                                                                                            IFS
            on this understanding, the ingredient flow speed is also   and V ) is not suitable, as the two variables might not be
                                                                    PS
            equal to the ratio of the total required volume V  and the   truly independent of each other. In addition, the actual
                                                  Req
            volume of the design model V .                     printing speed is largely different from the set printing
                                    E
                                                               speed (Table 2), and the control over printing speed is not
                                L   V Re q                     precise and limited.
                          V IFS  =  =                    V
                                E   V E                        4.3. Integration of constitutive equations into the
                                                               fluid flow model
               Equation (V) can be rearranged to Equation (VI),   Based on our understanding of the Foodini process
            where V  is the subject:                           parameters and fluid flow model, the constitutive Foodini
                  Req
                                                               Equation (VI) is integrated into the governing Equation
                          V  = V  . V                   VI     (IV) of the fluid flow model to derive a novel equation that
                            Req
                                     E
                                 IFS
                                                               models the food extrusion process using Foodini control
                                                               parameters, as  well  as the rheological  properties  of the
               Following conservation of mass, the volume extruded   food ink.
            by the plunger is equivalent to the amount of food ink
            exiting  the  nozzle.  The  total  volume  required  (Equation
            [VII]) is tantamount to the volume of the printed straight      Q = V  = V  . V                 X
                                                                                          E
                                                                                      IFS
                                                                                 Req
            line, which was modeled using the general equation
                  π
                     2
            V   =   d h , where  d represents the diameter and  h
             Req
                  4
            represents the height. Equation (VII)  is derived by                                           XI
            replacing d with the diameter of the printed line d and h
                                                     f
            with the length of printed line l , which is equal to the
                                      line
            printing speed V  multiplied by the time taken to extrude.
                         PS
                                                                                                         V
                                                                  Subsequently, replacing L with the following  L =  Req
                                π    2                         gives Equation (XII).                     π R 2
                          V Req  =  4  d ⋅  f  ⋅ V ⋅ t  VII
                                        PS
               Equation (VIII) is derived by replacing  V   with
            Equation (VI).                          Req                                                    XII
                                 π    2
                        V IFS  ⋅ V =  4  d ⋅  f  ⋅ V ⋅ t  VIII
                              E
                                         PS
                                                                  To  understand  the  relationship  between  ΔP  and  the
                                                               ingredient flow  speed  V , the ingredient flow  speed
                                                                                    IFS
                                                        IX     is taken out and combined, which is expressed in the
                                                               equation below.
               From Equation (IX), it can be observed that there
            is a complex relationship between the independent (d)
                                                         f
            and dependent parameters (V  and  V ). In addition,
                                     IFS
                                             PS
            the equation states that an increase in ingredient flow                                       XIII
            speed and a decrease in printing speed will result in a
            reduction in the width of the straight line. This is under




            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       227                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2787
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240