Page 238 - IJB-10-5
P. 238

International Journal of Bioprinting                                        Effect of ingredient flow speed




            24.  Lee JM, Yeong WY. A preliminary model of time-pressure   35.  Tian J, Chen J, Ye X, et al. Health benefits of the potato
               dispensing system for bioprinting based on printing   affected by domestic cooking: a review.  Food Chem.
               and material parameters.  Virtual  Phys Prototyp. 2014;   2016;202:165-175.
               10(1):3-8.                                         doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.120
               doi: 10.1080/17452759.2014.979557
                                                               36.  Beals KA. Potatoes, nutrition and health. Am J Potato Res.
            25.  Patel P, Mujmer K, Aswal VK, et al. Structure, rheology, and   2019;96(2):102-110.
               3D printing of salt-induced κ-carrageenan gels. Mater Today      doi: 10.1007/s12230-018-09705-4
               Commun. 2023;35: 105807.                        37.  Zhang  Z,  Zheng  B,  Tang  Y,  et  al.  Starch  concentration
               doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105807                  is an important factor for controlling its digestibility
            26.  Maldonado-Rosas R, Pérez-Castillo JL, Cuan-Urquizo   during hot-extrusion 3D printing.  Food Chem. 2022;
               E, et al. The role of controlled voids shape on the flexural   379:132180.
               properties of 3D printed food: an approach for tailoring      doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132180
               their mechanical properties.  Virtual  Phys Prototyp. 2024;   38.  Liu Z, Zhang M, Yang C-h. Dual extrusion 3D printing of
               19(1).                                             mashed potatoes/strawberry juice gel. Lwt. 2018;96:589-596.
               doi: 10.1080/17452759.2023.2284816                 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.014
            27.  Lee AY, Pant A, Hashimoto M, et al. 3D food printing   39.  Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari B, et al. Impact of rheological
               –  Asian  snacks  and  desserts.  Mater  Today  Proc.  2022;   properties of mashed potatoes on 3D printing. J Food Eng.
               70:611-615.                                        2018;220:76-82.
            28.  Ahmadzadeh S, Clary T, Rosales A, et al. Upcycling imperfect      doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.017
               broccoli and carrots into healthy snacks using an innovative   40.  Cui Y, Li C, Guo Y, et al. Rheological & 3D printing
               3D food printing approach. Food Sci Nutr. 2023;12(1):84-93.  properties of potato starch composite gels.  J Food Eng.
               doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3820                             2022;313(1):110756.
            29.  Chow CY, Thybo CD, Sager VF, et al. Printability, stability and      doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110756
               sensory properties of protein-enriched 3D-printed lemon   41.  Wu H, Sang S, Weng P, et al. Structural, rheological, and
               mousse for personalised in-between meals. Food Hydrocoll.   gelling characteristics of starch-based materials in context to
               2021;120:106943.                                   3D food printing applications in precision nutrition. Compr
               doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106943                 Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023;22(6):4217-4241.
            30.  Gudjónsdóttir  M,  Napitupulu  RJ,  Petty  Kristinsson  HT.      doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13217
               Low field NMR for quality monitoring of 3D printed surimi   42.  Liu Y, Dong L, Li Y, et al. Soy protein isolate-citrus pectin
               from cod by‐products: effects of the pH shift method   composite hydrogels induced by TGase and ultrasonic
               compared with conventional washing. Magn Reson Chem.   treatment: potential targeted delivery system for probiotics.
               2019;57(9):638-648.                                Food Hydrocoll. 2023;143(11): 108901.
               doi: 10.1002/mrc.4855                              doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108901
            31.  Hamilton AN, Gibson KE. Transfer rates of Salmonella   43.  Ma Y, Schutyser MAI, Boom RM, et al. Predicting the
               Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and a human   extrudability of complex food materials during 3D printing
               norovirus surrogate impacted by macronutrient composition   based on image analysis and gray-box data-driven modelling.
               of food inks in 3D food printing systems. Food Microbiol.   Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2021;73:102764.
               2023;113:104268.                                   doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102764
               doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104268
                                                               44.  Liu Z, Bhandari B, Prakash S, et al. Linking rheology and
            32.  Mirazimi F, Saldo J, Sepulcre F, et al. Enriched puree potato   printability of a multicomponent gel system of carrageenan-
               with soy protein for dysphagia patients by using 3D printing.   xanthan-starch in extrusion based additive manufacturing.
               Food Front. 2022;3(4):706-715.                     Food Hydrocoll. 2019;87:413-424.
               doi: 10.1002/fft2.149                              doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.026
            33.  Tay JU, Zhou C, Lee HW, et al. 3D printing of salmon   45.  Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari B. Effect of gums on the
               fillet  mimic:  imparting  printability  via  high-pressure   rheological, microstructural and extrusion printing
               homogenization and  post-printing  texturization  via   characteristics of mashed potatoes.  Int J Biol Macromol.
               transglutaminase. Food Hydrocoll. 2023;140: 108564.  2018;117:1179-1187.
               doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108564                 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.048
            34.  Tan JD, Lee CP, Foo SY, et al. 3D printability and biochemical   46.  Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari B, et al. 3D printing: printing
               analysis of revalorized orange peel waste.  Int J Bioprint.   precision  and  application  in  food  sector.  Trends Food Sci
               2023;9(5):776.                                     Technol. 2017;69:83-94.
               doi: 10.18063/ijb.776                              doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       230                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2787
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243