Page 267 - IJB-10-5
P. 267

International Journal of Bioprinting                                A TPMS framework for complete dentures




            size but also directly affects various mechanical properties,   Therefore    should be restricted to [ω  / 0.183· t, 0.9],
                                                                                               min
            including yield strength and flexural strength.  By   where  ω  generally refers to the minimum printable
                                                      37
                                                                      min
            adjusting parameter c (i.e., controlling wall thickness), the   thickness. Taking into account the practical conditions of
            relative density can be precisely adjusted. The approximate   the manufacturing equipment, assuming  ω min  ≥ 0.15mm,

            linear relationship between the parameter c and the relative   the relationship between c and t can be expressed as:
            density ρ is as follows:
                                                                      t min   ∙ c min  ≥0.82              (IV)

                           ρ = 66.1c                   (II)
                                                                  For ease of subsequent calculations and to demonstrate
                                                               gradient variation, we set c min  = 0.45 and t min  = 2. Within


               Under fixed cell size conditions, higher relative density   a specific overall model size, excessive cell sizes will lead
            corresponds to smaller pores. When the relative density   to significant deviations in the outer shape of the filled
            is equal to 60%, the gyroid structure becomes locally self-  structure compared to the original model (Figure 2B).
            intersecting, and the internal pores become discontinuous   Therefore, this study sets c∈[0.45,0.9] (the corresponding
            (Figure 2A). According to Equation II, it can be deduced   range of relative density values at 30–60%) and t∈[2,3].
            that the coefficient c max  attains a value of 0.9 at a relative   The design types of relative density gradient variation
            density of 60%. Furthermore, there is an approximate   include  first-increasing-then-decreasing  (A),  first-
            relationship between wall thickness, relative density, and   decreasing-then-increasing (B), and constant (C) from the
            monocyte size: 38                                  radial direction, as depicted in Figure 3A. Likewise, we also
                                                               implemented radial gradient changes for the design types
                                                               of cell size gradient variation, including first-increasing-
                                                               then-decreasing (I), first-decreasing-then-increasing (II),
                          ω  ≈ 0.183 . t . c           (III)   and constant (III), as displayed in Figure 3B.
                           min
                                                                  Nine radial gradient design types were obtained and
               where  ω  is the minimum wall thickness, and  t is   named  according  to their  respective gradient variation.
                      min
            the  parameter  that  determines  the  size  of  the  unit  cell.   For example, A-I represents an initially increasing central


































            Figure 2. Schematic diagram of changes in relative density and unit cell size of porous structures. (A) Fixed unit cell size with a relative density of 10–90%.
            (B) Fixed relative density, with the unit cell size at 0.5–4 mm.


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       259                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3453
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272