Page 481 - IJB-10-5
P. 481

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   3D-printed post-otoplasty ear retainer




            be attributed to its inability to provide adequate support   3D printing technology is becoming increasingly
            at the cranio-auricular groove. Although both devices can   significant in the field of medical devices due to its
            provide a certain level of shape retention after auricular   capabilities in printing and shaping a wide range of
            surgery, the external stretching device, which functions   materials, its precision, and its ability to meet personalized
            to alter the shape of the auricle in infant patients with   and  other customized  requirements,  as well as  its  high
            auricular deformities through the principle of stretching,   material utilization rate during the printing process. 24,25
            has a good retention ability to maintain auricular length.   Recently,  3D  printing  technology  has  been  widely  used
            However, it cannot offer personalized treatment for   for preoperative planning, 26,27  customizing surgical tools
            different individuals, leading to inferior performance in   and prostheses, 28,29  patient education, 30,31  bioprinting, and
            maintaining auricular width and H-M distance compared   tissue engineering. 32,33  The technology makes it possible
            to the personalized 3D-printed retainer in some cases.  for surgeons to customize medical devices with high-
                                                               precision and complex structures based on specific patient
            4. Discussion                                      anatomical data.  Postoperative shape retention devices in
                                                                            34
            In this study, we successfully developed a novel 3D-printed   plastic surgery are widely used to stabilize and support the
            personalized ear-shaped retainer for post-surgical recovery.   surgical area, thereby facilitating the healing process and
            The printed material was tested for its properties and   maintaining the surgical results. Nasal splints and casts are
            displayed good performance. The material can maintain   typically made of thermoplastic and used after rhinoplasty
            effective stress under long-term strain and has certain   to stabilize the nasal structure, reduce swelling, and prevent
                                                                          35,36
            self-recovery properties under low deformation, meeting   displacement.   A surgical binder is commonly used
            the required performance for retainers. Additionally, the   after breast surgeries (e.g., augmentation or reduction)
            newly adopted material, BioMed Flex 80A Resin, has   to maintain breast shape, reduce swelling and pain, and
                                                                                              37,38
            good biocompatibility, allowing for long-term contact   prevent  postoperative  complications.    Likewise,  ear
            with the patient’s skin. Using the mechanical test data of   molding techniques can be used to maintain or even
                                                                                                   39,40
            the material, we conducted FEA of the retainer’s contact   change the morphology of the ear cartilage.   However,
            with the ear. The results indicated good contact between   devices using metal retractors have limited effectiveness in
            the retainer and the skin, with relatively uniform stress   maintaining the shape of large areas of ear cartilage. To our
            distribution around it. Notable stress concentration was   knowledge, there has yet to be a device for post-otoplasty
            observed at parts of the ear that require shape maintenance   shape retention in clinical practice. Hence, the combination
            after corrective ear surgery, such as the scapha, triangular   of 3D printing and structured light technology now allows
            fossa, antihelix, its superior and inferior crus, and the anti-  for the design and production of personalized ear-shaped
            helical fossa, providing good shape maintenance stress. The   retainers for post-otoplasty applications.
            stress around the ear’s skin was relatively uniform or lower,   Photopolymer-based resins used in SLA contain
            and the overall structural stability was good. The pattern of   various chemical components that may cause skin
            stress and strain changes suggests that wearing the retainer   irritation or allergic reactions. Post-processes/cured resins
            provides some mechanical protection for the post-surgical   are generally less likely to cause any irritation. BioMed
            shape of the ear. Preliminary testing with 20 patients   Flex  80A  Resin  is  a  flexible,  biocompatible  material
            wearing the retainer for 8 h/day over a week did not result   designed for medical applications that require long-term
            in any skin allergy incidents, demonstrating high patient   skin contact, i.e., over 30 days. This resin is produced in a
            acceptance and good compliance with the retainer design.   United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-
            Some patients reported odors from long-term wear, which   registered, ISO 13485-certified facility and is certified
            will be improved in future designs by adding ventilation   according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP)
            holes.  To  address  pain  from  too-tight  fit  and  prolonged   Class VI standards, indicating its safety for biocompatible
            wear, we will make corresponding improvements in   applications. In our experiments, we did not observe any
            subsequent designs. To better study the performance of the   significant sensitization reactions caused by the retainer.
            retainer, we compared its effectiveness in maintaining the   There are no extensive studies specifically addressing
            auricle shape in postoperative patients to that of an external   long-term skin irritation from BioMed Flex 80A Resin.
            stretching device. The results indicated that the retainer   However, the certifications and standards of the resin
            achieved similar efficacy to the external stretching device   imply that thorough testing for potential skin reactions
            in maintaining auricle length. Moreover, the personalized   was performed. The resin is designed to minimize
            retainer demonstrated superior efficacy in maintaining   risks associated with prolonged contact, including skin
            auricle width and H-M distance.                    irritation and sensitization. Despite this, surgeons should




            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       473                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3986
   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486