Page 482 - IJB-10-5
P. 482

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   3D-printed post-otoplasty ear retainer




            be aware of potential skin sensitization issues in clinical   Author contributions
            applications and advise patients to regularly monitor their   Conceptualization: Peixu Wang, Lin Lin
            skin condition.
                                                               Formal analysis: Yiwen Deng
               Nonetheless,  we  plan  to  improve  the  design  and   Investigation: Di Wang, Litao Jia
            performance of the 3D-printed retainer in future research.   Methodology: Bo Pan, Xiaobo Yu, Wenshuai Liu, Xia Liu
            Detailed biomechanical parameter  profiles  will  be used   Writing – original draft: Peixu Wang
            in FEA to optimize the retainer design. High-precision   Writing – review & editing: Lin Lin, Haiyue Jiang
            printing is the future of 3D printing development, as it
            can improve the accuracy of the retainer, enhance its   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            fit with the  patient’s  skin, and provide more effective   Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the
            support. Furthermore, hollow or lattice structures can be   institutional review board of the Plastic Surgery Hospital
            printed for future retainer designs to improve retainer   of Chinese Academic of Medical Science and Peking Union
            performance, reduce its overall weight, and maintain   Medical College, Beijing, China (approval no. 2022[183]).
            the initial support strength.  Considering all associated   Written consent was obtained from each of the subjects to
                                   41
            costs, such as materials, machine maintenance, skilled   participate in the study.
            labor, and additional operational expenses, an accurate
            cost-effectiveness analysis is necessary. A pilot study   Consent for publication
            requires only a small number of patients to assess the   Written consent was obtained from each of the subjects to
            clinical feasibility of 3D-printed retainers. Additionally, a   publish their data and images.
            clinical trial with a larger sample size and a multicenter,
            randomized, open-control design is required to validate   Availability of data
            the performance of the retainer.
                                                               Data can be available for readers upon reasonable request.
            Conclusion
                                                               References
            In this study, we have successfully developed a
            personalized  postoperative  auricular  retainer  using  SLA   1.   Zhuang Q, Wei N, Zhou Q, et al. Efficacy and timing of
            3D printing technology and a biocompatible resin bioink.   neonatal  ear correction  molding.  Aesthetic Plast Surg.
            The personalized 3D-printed retainer offers a promising   2020;44(3):872-878.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01596-y
            solution for post-otoplasty support, providing consistent,
            effective, and biocompatible results. Further research with   2.   Lin J, Sclafani AP. Otoplasty for congenital auricular
            a larger clinical sample size is warranted to validate its   malformations.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am.
            long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness.            2018;26(1):31-40.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2017.09.003
            Acknowledgments                                    3.   Joukhadar N, McKee D, Caouette-Laberge L, Bezuhly
                                                                  M. Management of congenital auricular anomalies.
            None.                                                 Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(2):205e-216e.
                                                                  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006997
            Fundings                                           4.   Handler  EB,  Song  T,  Shih C.  Complications  of  otoplasty.

            This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of     Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(4):653-662.
            Medical Science Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences      doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2013.08.001
            (2021-I2M-052), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology   5.   Basat  SO,  Askeroglu  U,  Aksan  T,  et  al.  New  otoplasty
            Commission (No. Z221100007422084), Young Scientists   approach: a laterally based postauricular dermal flap as an
            Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China   addition to Mustarde and Furnas to prevent suture extrusion
            (Grant  No.  8230092675),  and  Beijing  Natural  Science      and recurrence. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(1):83-89.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0269-z
            Foundation (No.7244400).
                                                               6.   Chen L, Li C, He A, et al. Long-term effectiveness of ear
            Conflict of interest                                  molding and factors affecting outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg.
                                                                  2024;153(4):905-913.
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010678





            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       474                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3986
   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487