Page 483 - IJB-10-5
P. 483

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   3D-printed post-otoplasty ear retainer




            7.   Zhang JL, Li CL, Fu YY, Zhang TY. Newborn ear defomities   18.  Cai  M,  Shen  S,  Li  H,  Zhang  X,  Ma  Y.  Study  of  contact
               and their  treatment efficiency with  earwell infant ear   characteristics between a respirator and a headform. J Occup
               correction system in China. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.   Environ Hyg. 2016;13(3):D50-60.
               2019;124:129-133.                                  doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1116699
               doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.06.001
                                                               19.  Tse KM, Tan LB, Lee SJ, Lim SP, Lee HP. Investigation of
            8.   Sayadi  JJ,  Arora  JS,  Chattopadhyay  A,  Hopkins  E,  Quiter   the relationship between facial injuries and traumatic brain
               A,  Khosla  RK.  A  retrospective  review of outcomes  and   injuries using a realistic subject-specific finite element head
               complications after infant ear molding at a single institution.   model. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;79:13-32.
               Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(8):e5133.     doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.012
               doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005133
                                                               20.  Chafi MS, Karami G, Ziejewski M. Biomechanical
            9.   Xu H, Ding S, Yang H, et al. The treatment effect of non-  assessment of brain dynamic responses due to blast pressure
               surgical ear molding correction in children with mild   waves. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(2):490-504.
               cryptotia deformity. Laryngoscope. 2023;133(9):2122-2128.     doi: 10.1007/s10439-009-9813-z
               doi: 10.1002/lary.30491
                                                               21.  Lu P, Liao Z, Zeng Q, et al. Customized three-dimensional-
            10.  Aygit AC. Molding the ears after anterior scoring and   printed orthopedic close contact casts for the treatment of
               concha repositioning: a combined approach for protruding   stable ankle fractures: finite element analysis and a pilot
               ear correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(1):77-81.  study. ACS Omega. 2021;6(4):3418-3426.
               doi: 10.1007/s00266-002-0095-1                     doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06031
            11.  Triacca A, Pitzanti G, Mathew E, Conti B, Dorati R, Lamprou   22.  Chan  SC,  Chan  AP.  The  validity  and  applicability  of  the
               DA. Stereolithography 3D printed implants: a preliminary   Chinese version of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction
               investigation as potential local drug delivery systems to the   with assistive technology for people with spinal cord injury.
               ear. Int J Pharm. 2022;616:121529.                 Assist Technol. 2006;18(1):25-33.
               doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121529
                                                                  doi: 10.1080/10400435.2006.10131904
            12.  Ng WL, An J, Chua CK. Process, material, and regulatory
               considerations  for  3D  printed  medical  devices  and  tissue   23.  Wang D, Jiang H, Yang Q, et al. Non-surgical correction
               constructs. Engineering. 2024;36:146-166.          of cryptotia and the analysis of treatment time and
               doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.01.028                     other influence factors.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
                                                                  2020;129:109771.
            13.  Vidakis N, Petousis M, Michailidis N, et al. High-     doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109771
               performance medical-grade resin radically reinforced with
               cellulose nanofibers for 3D printing. J Mech Behav Biomed   24.  Palmara G, Frascella F, Roppolo I, Chiappone A, Chiado A.
               Mater. 2022;134:105408.                            Functional 3D printing: approaches and bioapplications.
               doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105408                   Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;175:112849.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112849
            14.  Ambrosio D, Gabrion X, Malécot P, Amiot F, Thibaud S.
               Influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical   25.  Wang S, Zhao S, Yu J, Gu Z, Zhang Y. Advances in translational
               properties of projection stereolithography–manufactured   3D printing for cartilage, bone, and osteochondral tissue
               specimens. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;106(1):265-277.  engineering. Small. 2022;18(36):e2201869.
               doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04415-5                    doi: 10.1002/smll.202201869
            15.  Aravind Shanmugasundaram S, Razmi J, Mian MJ, Ladani L.   26.  He L, Liu X, Khatter NJ, Yu X, Washington KM, Shu M.
               Mechanical anisotropy and surface roughness in additively   Treatment  of  progressive  hemifacial  atrophy  by  cartilage
               manufactured parts fabricated by stereolithography (SLA)   graft and free adipofascial flap combined with three-
               using statistical analysis. Materials. 2020;13(11):2496.  dimensional planning.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(3):
               doi: 10.3390/ma13112496                            679-688.
                                                                  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010585
            16.  Zhang S, Bhagia S, Li M, Meng X, Ragauskas AJ. Wood-
               reinforced composites by stereolithography with the stress   27.  Schwam ZG,  Chang MT, Barnes MA, Paskhover B.
               whitening behavior. Materials & Design. 2021;206:109773.  Applications of 3-dimensional printing in facial plastic
               doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109773                  surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(3):427-428.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.10.016
            17.  Keßler A, Dosch M, Reymus M, Folwaczny M. Influence
               of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on   28.  Li H, Fan W, Zhu X. Three-dimensional printing: the
               the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides.    potential technology widely used in medical fields. J Biomed
               J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(2):196-204.              Mater Res A. 2020;108(11):2217-2229.
               doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.038                doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36979




            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       475                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3986
   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488