Page 541 - IJB-10-5
P. 541

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Biomimetic scaffolds for mandibular repair


































            Figure 4. Enrichment analysis reveals the mechanisms by which the scaffold promotes bone regeneration. (A) GO enrichment analysis of differentially
            expressed genes (DEGs) in SIT scaffolds. (B) KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs in SIT scaffolds. (C) Gene set variation analysis of control, TPMS and SIT
            groups. Abbreviations: T: TPMS scaffolds; SIT: TPMS scaffolds loaded with SDF-1 and I-PRF.


            MAPK and VEGF signaling pathways (Figure 4C). GSEA   the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. 37,40  ERK1/2, a member
            analysis found that the SIT group could promote bone   of MAPK, can be promoted by SDF-1 and plays a key role
            development, osteoclast differentiation, angiogenesis,   in angiogenesis.  Previous studies found that ERK1/2
                                                                            41
            the positive regulation of MAPK cascade, and the WNT   induces osteogenic differentiation by promoting the
            signaling pathway (Figure 5A–F). To explore protein-  phosphorylation of Runx2 and inducing the activation
            protein interactions, we inputted DEGs into the STRING   ability of Runx2. 42–44  Taken together, this suggests that
            database and investigated the top 20 key genes using the   SIT  scaffolds  promote  mandibular  defect  repair  in vivo,
            cytoHubba in Cytoscape, including JUN, FOS, and RUNX2   possibly via the MAPK pathway.
            (Figure 5G). These results together revealed the important
            role of SIT scaffold in BMSCs behaviors and bone repair.  Notably, FOS/JUN exhibited higher expression in the
                                                               SIT group and serves as a key hub in the protein interaction
               I-PRF has been utilized for regenerative applications   network. Activator protein 1 (AP-1), a transcriptional
            in the field of dentistry. Wang et al. co-cultured I-PRF   regulator consisting of members from the Fos and Jun
            with human primary osteoblasts and found that I-PRF   families,  plays a vital role in bone development. 45,46  The
            significantly promoted osteogenic differentiation, with   c-Jun protein directly promotes angiogenesis, indicating
            higher mRNA levels of  ALP,  RUNX2, and osteocalcin   the potential importance of c-Fos/c-Jun heterodimers in
            in the I-PRF group.  Combined with our results, this   SIT-mediated angiogenesis. 47,48
                             37
            indicates that I-PRF remains unaffected and continues
            to exert its reparative potential when loaded onto TPMS   3.4. Rabbit mandible section staining
            scaffolds. The MAPK/ERK pathway is a vital connection   In this study, mandibular defect modeling in New Zealand
            between cell surface and nuclear control of growth,   white rabbits was observed for two months, by means of
            development, movement, and cell demise, interacting with   tissue section staining, to explore the effectiveness of bone
            various molecular pathways and having a key function in   tissue  regeneration (Figure  6).  Staining results revealed
            bone creation. 38,39  Previous studies have demonstrated that   the presence of new bone formation (indicated by yellow
            SDF-1 significantly influences the expression of early- and   asterisks) around the defect periphery, with the injury
            mid-stage osteogenic markers by activating the Smad and   site mainly occupied by connective tissue and muscle
            MAPK signaling pathways, and I-PRF can regulate the   fibers. Higher levels of new bone formation were observed
            osteogenic differentiation of human BMSCs by activating   around and within the implanted TPMS and SIT scaffolds.

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       533                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4147
   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546