Page 67 - IJB-6-1
P. 67

Huyan, et al.
               7:e6358. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6358.                   biot.201000254.
           6.   Han XX, Courseaus J, Khamassi J, et al., 2018, Optimized   19.  Kuppan P, Sethuraman S, Krishnan UM, 2017, In Vitro Co-
               Vascular Network by Stereolithography for Tissue Engineered   Culture  of Epithelial  Cells  and Smooth  Muscle Cells  on
               Skin. Int J Bioprinting, 4(2):17. DOI: 10.18063/IJB.v4i2.134.  Aligned Nanofibrous Scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol
           7.   Ng  WL,  Chua  CK,  Shen  YF,  2019,  Print  Me  An  Organ!   Appl, 81:191–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.050.
               Why We Are Not There Yet. Prog. Polym Sci, 97:45. DOI:   20.  Yanez M, Rincon J, Dones A, et al., 2015, In Vivo Assessment
               10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145.                 of Printed Microvasculature in a Bilayer Skin Graft to Treat
           8.   Liu F, Liu C, Chen QH, et al., 2018, Progress in Organ 3D   Full-Thickness Wounds. Tissue Eng Part A, 21(1-2):224–33.
               Bioprinting. Int J Bioprinting, 4(1):15. DOI: 10.18063/IJB.  DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0561.
               v4i1.128.                                       21.  Nye R, Robinia  K, Peterson  P, et  al.,  2018,  Efficacy  of  a
           9.   An J, Teoh JEM, Suntornnond R, et al., 2015, Design and 3D   Nitric  Oxide  Dressing in Decreasing  Bacterial  Counts on
               Printing of Scaffolds and Tissues. Engineering, 1(2):261–8.   Human Skin. J Wound Care, 27(7):S19–25. DOI: 10.12968/
               DOI: 10.15302/j-eng-2015061.                        jowc.2018.27.Sup7.S19.
           10.  Choudhury D, Anand S, Naing MW, 2018, The Arrival  of   22.  Garcia M, Escamez MJ, Carretero M, et al., 2007, Modeling
               Commercial Bioprinters Towards 3D Bioprinting Revolution!   Normal and Pathological  Processes  Through Skin  Tissue
               Int J Bioprinting, 4(2):20. DOI: 10.18063/IJB.v4i2.139.  Engineering.  Mol Carcinog, 46(8):741–5. DOI: 10.1002/
           11.  Zhuang P, Sun AX, An  J, et al., 2018, 3D  Neural  Tissue   mc.20327.
               Models:  From  Spheroids  to  Bioprinting.  Biomaterials,   23.  Yannas IV,  Tzeranis DS,  So PTC, 2017, Regeneration  of
               154:113–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.002.  Injured Skin and Peripheral  Nerves Requires Control of
           12.  Chong C, Wang Y, Fathi A, et al., 2019, Skin Wound Repair:   Wound  Contraction,  not  Scar  Formation.  Wound  Repair
               Results  of a Pre-clinical  Study to Evaluate  Electropsun   Regen, 25(2):177–91. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12516.
               Collagen-Elastin-PCL Scaffolds as Dermal Substitutes.   24.  Feldman  AT,  Wolfe  D,  2014,  Tissue  Processing  and
               Burns, 45(7):1639–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.014.  Hematoxylin  and Eosin Staining. Methods Mol Biol,
           13.  Kandhasamy S, Arthi N, Arun RP, et al., 2019, Synthesis   1180:31–43. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1050-2_3.
               and Fabrication of Novel Quinone-Based Chromenopyrazole   25.  Ferringer   T,   2015,   Immunohistochemistry   in
               Antioxidant-Laden  Silk  Fibroin  Nanofibers  Scaffold  for   Dermatopathology.  Arch  Pathol  Lab  Med, 139(1):83–105.
               Tissue  Engineering  Applications.  Mater  Sci  Eng C Mater   DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0075-RA.
               Biol Appl, 102:773–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.076.  26.  Ng WL, Qi JTZ, Yeong WY, et al., 2018, Proof-of-Concept:
           14.  Baltazar  T, Merola J, Catarino C, et al.,  2019, Three   3D Bioprinting  of Pigmented  Human Skin Constructs.
               Dimensional Bioprinting of a  Vascularized  and Perfusable   Biofabrication, 10(2):025005. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/
               Skin  Graft  Using  Human  Keratinocytes,  Fibroblasts,   aa9e1e.
               Pericytes, and Endothelial Cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 12. DOI:   27.  Huang S, Yao B, Xie J, et al., 2016, 3D Bioprinted Extracellular
               10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0201.                          Matrix  Mimics  Facilitate  Directed  Differentiation  of
           15.  Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, The Future of Skin Toxicology   Epithelial  Progenitors for Sweat Gland Regeneration.  Acta
               Testing Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Meets Microfluidics.   Biomater, 32: 170–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.039.
               Int  J  Bioprinting,  5(2.1):44–54.  DOI: 10.18063/ijb.  28.  Kim BS, Kwon  YW, Kong JS,  et al., 2018, 3D Cell
               v5i2.1.237.                                         Printing of In Vitro Stabilized Skin Model and In Vivo Pre-
           16.  Wang JH, Chen J, Kuo SM, et al., 2019, Methods for   Vascularized Skin Patch Using Tissue-Specific Extracellular
               Assessing  Scaffold Vascularization  In Vivo.  Methods Mol   Matrix Bioink:  A  Step  Towards  Advanced Skin  Tissue
               Biol, 1993:217–26. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9473-1_17.  Engineering.  Biomaterials, 168:38–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.
           17.  Li  Y, Lu H, Gu  Y, et al., 2017, Enhancement  of   biomaterials.2018.03.040.
               NK  Cells  Proliferation  and  Function  by  Shikonin.   29.  Chen H, Xing X, Tan H, et al., 2017, Covalently Antibacterial
               Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol, 39(3):124–30. DOI:   Alginate-Chitosan  Hydrogel Dressing Integrated  Gelatin
               10.1080/08923973.2017.1299174.                      Microspheres Containing  Tetracycline  Hydrochloride  for
           18.  Zhou S,  Cui Z, Urban J, 2011, Dead Cell Counts During   Wound Healing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 70:287–
               Serum  Cultivation  are  Underestimated  by  the  Fluorescent   95. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.086.
               Live/Dead Assay. Biotechnol J, 6(5):513–8. DOI: 10.1002/  30.  Nezhad ZM, Poncelet A, Fervaille C, et al., 2019, Comparing

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 1        63
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72