Page 108 - IJB-6-4

Triple-layered coaxial nozzle for 3D bioprinting
Department of Science, Technology, and Additive Manufacturing via Tomographic Reconstruction.
Innovation, COLCIENCIAS, and the National Science, 363:1075–9.
Doctorate Scholarship Program-647 and by the 13. Li J, Wu C, Chu PK, Gelinsky M, 2020, 3D Printing of
German Academic Exchange Service (Deutscher Hydrogels: Rational Design Strategies and Emerging
Akademischer Austauschdienst). DAAD, Biomedical Applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep, 140:100543.
Research Grants-Short Term Grants, 2018. “No 14. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al., 2019, 3D Bioprinting
conflict of interest was reported by all authors.” of Collagen to Rebuild Components of the Human Heart.
Science, 365:482–7.
Conflicts of interest 15. Bernal PN, Delrot P, Loterie D, et al., 2019, Volumetric

No conflicts of interest were declared by all Bioprinting of Complex Living-Tissue Constructs within
authors. Seconds. Adv Mater, 31:42.
16. Levato R, Jungst T, Scheuring RG, et al., 2020, From Shape
References to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting. Adv Mater,
2020:1906423.
1. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and 17. Moroni L, Burdick JA, Highley C, et al., 2018, Biofabrication
Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85. Strategies for 3D In Vitro Models and Regenerative Medicine.
2. Pati F, Gantelius J, Svahn HA, 2016, 3D Bioprinting of Nat Rev Mater, 3:21–37.
Tissue/Organ Models. Angew Chem, 55:4650–65. 18. Ravnic DJ, Leberfinger AN, Koduru SV, et al., 2017,
3. Heinrich MA, Liu W, Jimenez A, et al., 2019, 3D Bioprinting: Transplantation of Bioprinted Tissues and Organs: Technical
From Benches to Translational Applications. Small, 15:1–47. and Clinical Challenges and Future Perspectives. Ann Surg,
4. Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S, et al., 2019, 266:48–58.
Extrusion Bioprinting of Soft Materials: An Emerging Technique 19. Ke D, Murphy SV, 2019, Current Challenges of Bioprinted
for Biological Model Fabrication. Appl Phys Rev, 6:11310. Tissues Toward Clinical Translation. Tissue Eng Part B Rev,
5. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, et al., 2017, Proposal to Assess 25:1–13.
Printability of Bioinks for Extrusion-based Bioprinting 20. Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, et al., 2016, A 3D Bioprinting
and Evaluation of Rheological Properties Governing System to Produce Human-scale Tissue Constructs with
Bioprintability. Biofabrication, 9:4. Structural Integrity. Nat Biotechnol, 34:312–9.
6. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future 21. Distler T, Ruther F, Boccaccini AR, et al., 2019, Development
Perspectives in Extrusion-based Bioprinting. Biomaterials, of 3D Biofabricated Cell Laden Hydrogel Vessels and a Low-
76:321–43. Cost Desktop Printed Perfusion Chamber for In Vitro Vessel
7. Hölzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, et al., 2016, Bioink Properties before, Maturation. Macromol Biosci, 19:9.
during and after 3D Bioprinting. Biofabrication, 8:32002. 22. Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al., 2016, Direct
8. Jungst T, Smolan W, Schacht K, et al., 2016, Strategies and 3D Bioprinting of Perfusable Vascular Constructs Using a
Molecular Design Criteria for 3D Printable Hydrogels. Chem Blend Bioink. Biomaterials, 106:58–68.
Rev, 116:1496–539. 23. Gao G, Park JY, Kim BS, et al., 2018, Coaxial Cell Printing
9. Williams D, Thayer P, Martinez H, et al., 2018, A Perspective of Freestanding, Perfusable, and Functional In Vitro Vascular
on the Physical, Mechanical and Biological Specifications of Models for Recapitulation of Native Vascular Endothelium
Bioinks and the Development of Functional Tissues in 3D Pathophysiology. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:1–12.
Bioprinting. Bioprinting, 9:19–36. 24. Dranseikiene D, Schrüfer S, Schubert DW, et al., 2020, Cell-
10. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, et al., 2017, The Bioink: laden Alginate Dialdehyde Gelatin Hydrogels Formed in 3D
A Comprehensive Review on Bioprintable Materials. Printed Sacrificial Gel. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 31:3–7.
Biotechnol Adv, 35:217–39. 25. Blaeser A, Campos DF, Puster U, et al., 2016, Controlling
11. Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN, et al., 2015, Three- Shear Stress in 3D Bioprinting is a Key Factor to Balance
dimensional Printing of Complex Biological Structures by Printing Resolution and Stem Cell Integrity. Adv Healthc
Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogels. Mater, 5:326–33.
Sci Adv, 1:9. 26. Nair K, Gandhi M, Khalil S, et al., 2009, Characterization of Cell
12. Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H, et al., 2019, Volumetric Viability during Bioprinting Processes. Biotechnol J, 4:1168–77.

104 International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 4