Page 76 - IJB-6-4
P. 76

Applications of 3D bioprinted iPSCs
           bioprinting. The  use of non-integrative  methods   creating  organ building blocks composed of
           and small molecules to activate the pluripotency    hundreds of thousands of iPSCs and then rapidly
           program in somatic  cells represents the safest     3D bioprinting vasculature  into  those  building
           approach to produce clinical grade iPSCs  cells.    blocks .  The SWIFT method could create  a
                                                                     [70]
           High  throughput  screening  to  identify  small    perfusable  cardiac  tissue  that  fuses and  beats
           molecules  for cell  reprogramming  is ongoing      synchronously for more than a week, taking the
           in  many laboratories,  with  a  goal  to  establish   field of bioprinting vascularized functional tissues
           iPSCs free of any exogenously introduced            using iPSCs to the next level.
           DNA  fragments.  Incompletely  differentiated
           cells evoked immune response in transplanted        7 Future perspectives for iPSCs in bioprinting
           animals [153] .  Therefore,  obtaining  completely   Despite  the  challenges  associated  with the  use
           differentiated cells for therapeutic purpose are of   of reprogrammed iPSCs  and limitations  of
           prime importance. Futuristic technology should be   bioprinting,  the potential  of bioprinting  iPSC-
           focused on establishing safe strategies for genetic
           modification  of  iPSCs,  devise  efficient  methods   derived tissue is tremendous  in the health-care
           for differentiation and purification of iPSCs into   field.  Resolution  of  these  challenges  will  have
           required cell types in vitro for transplantation.   significant  implications  in  the  understanding  of
             After production of iPSCs, there are limitations   human diseases and will have major effects on the
           in the bioprinting process itself and associated    treatment of these diseases. Future perspectives of
           challenges in the preparation of optimized bioinks   bioprinting iPSCs should focus on:
                                                               •  Establishing  xeno-free and footprint-free
           suitable for each cell type. 3D bioprinting has the    clinical-grade iPSC reprogramming protocols:
           advantage  of  reconstructing  complex  structures     The use of non-integrative methods and
           from computed tomography or magnetic                   small molecules should be further explored.
           resonance imaging images and producing accurate        High  throughput  screening  to  identify  small
           structures from predetermined digital designs such     molecules for cell reprogramming to establish
           as computer-aided  design  models.  The  support       iPSCs free of any exogenously introduced
                                                                  DNA fragments would be potential  area to
           scaffold  materials  with  suitable mechanical         focus on.
           and  biological  properties  can  be  designed  and   •  Development  of  tissue-specific  bioinks
           printed  using advanced  3D printers.  Directed        for bioprinting: New bioinks with tunable
           differentiation  of  printed  iPSCs  to  different  cell   mechanical  and  rheological   properties
           lineages is required for organ printing. When we       that mimic the native tissue ECM is to be
           use  undifferentiated  iPSCs  for  bioprinting,  the   developed  and  a  deeper  understanding  of
                                                                  cell-bioink interactions must be sought as the
           printing  parameters  should be adjusted  to avoid     mechanobiology and the molecular pathways
           any mechanical damage to the cells, as iPSCs are       would have a major effect on the differentiation
           highly sensitive cells. Depending on the type of       of the bioprinted iPSCs.
           the bioprinting method used, the cells are exposed   •  Improved bioprinting  strategies  to mitigate
           to high shear forces, radiation-induced  damage,       harmful  effects  on  cells:  Since  iPSCs  are
           and electric or thermal stresses during the printing   sensitive cells (not as sturdy as cancer cell
                                                                  lines), the mechanical,  thermal,  or chemical
           process [154,155] .                                    stressors induced  by  the  bioprinting  process
             Vascularization  and innervation  of the             might  result  in  cell-phenotype  changes  and
           bioprinted  tissue are a challenge  to achieve.        functionality. Strategies to mitigate  the
           Bioprinted  iPSC constructs are unable  to form        exposure of cells to these process-induced
           long-term  viable  and vascularized  tissue.  To       stressors must be developed.
           resolve this problem, researchers at Wyss institute   •  Integrated bioreactor systems for tissue
                                                                  maturation: Bioprinting of functional tissues
           recently  developed  a  method  called  sacrificial    with iPSC-derived cells would be successful
           writing into functional tissue (SWIFT), which is a     only if they can be matured and maintained
           multistep biomanufacturing process that involves       over a long-term in physiologically-relevant

           72                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 4
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81