Page 212 - IJB-10-6
P. 212

International Journal of Bioprinting                            Effect of G/GO on photocurable resin structure



























































                   Figure 6. Schematic representation of the effects of graphene and graphene oxide on the photopolymerization process of the resin.


            reduced interlayer adhesion due to the presence of GBN.   decreases from 200 to 50 μm, higher crosslinking density
            Microscopic analysis does not reveal poor interlayer   is induced, increasing Young’s modulus due to more
            adhesion but indicates lower print quality with G, likely due   densely spaced crosslinked layers. However, when the layer
            to increased imperfections and defects, which contribute   thickness is reduced to 25 μm, an unexpected decrease in
            to the negative effect on mechanical properties. In relation   Young’s modulus is observed.  This decrease is attributed
                                                                                       48
            to the effect of printing parameters on the mechanical   to insufficient inter-layer crosslinking, as there are not
            properties of printed parts, it is worth mentioning that   enough monomers available between each crosslinked
            other studies have also reported correlations between
            mechanical properties, printing process peculiarities, and   layer to ensure efficient stress transfer, resulting in a lower
            crosslinking of the polymeric structure. For example,   modulus. Throughout our study, the layer thickness had
            previous research has found that the frequency of UV   been kept constant in all samples, but this mechanism is
            curing and the resulting crosslinking density play crucial   similar to the effect observed with the addition of GO,
            roles. These studies demonstrated that as layer thickness   when it acts as radical scavenger.

            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       204                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4075
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217