Page 49 - IJB-7-1

Attarilar, et al.
Erosion-corrosion Behavior of Equal Channel Angular for Dental Applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater,
Pressed Pure Titanium. Results Phys, 17:103141. 90:20–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.047.
113. Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M, et al., 2016, 123. Nune KC, Kumar A, Misra RD, et al., 2017, Functional
Effect of Pore Size on Bone Ingrowth into Porous Titanium Response of Osteoblasts in Functionally Gradient Titanium
Implants Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing: An In Vivo Alloy Mesh Arrays Processed by 3D Additive Manufacturing.
Experiment. Mater Sci Eng C, 59:690–701. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 150:78–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.050.
114. Li X, Ma XY, Feng YF, et al., 2015, A Novel Composite 124. Liang H, Yang Y, Xie D, et al., 2019, Trabecular-like Ti-6Al-
Scaffold Consisted of Porous Titanium and Chitosan Sponge 4V Scaffolds for Orthopedic: Fabrication by Selective Laser
for Load-bearing Applications: Fabrication, Characterization Melting and In Vitro Biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Technol,
and Cellular Activity. Compos Sci Technol, 117:78–84. 35:1284–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.05.019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.01.012.
115. Zhang C, Zhang L, Liu L, et al., 2020, Mechanical Behavior 125. Wang S, Liu L, Li K, et al., 2019, Pore Functionally Graded
of a Titanium Alloy Scaffold Mimicking Trabecular Structure. Ti6Al4V Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Application.
J Orthop Surg Res, 15:40. Mater Des, 168:107643.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1489-y. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107643.
116. McGilvray KC, Easley J, Seim HB, et al., 2018, Bony 126. Yosra K, 2018, EIT Emerging Implant Technology Granted
Ingrowth Potential of 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Alloy: A FDA Multilevel Approval for their 3D Printed Cervical Cage,
Direct Comparison of Interbody Cage Materials in an In Vivo SPINEMarketGroup. Available from: https://3dadept.com/
Ovine Lumbar Fusion Model. Spine J, 18:1250–60. eit-emerging-implant-technology-granted-fda-multilevel-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. approval-for-their-3d-printed-cervical-cage/. [Last accessed
117. Song P, Hu C, Pei X, et al., 2019, Dual Modulation of on 2020 Nov 30].
Crystallinity and Macro-/Microstructures of 3D Printed 127. Martial Y, 2019, Nexxt Spine creates 3D Printed Porous
Porous Titanium Implants to Enhance Stability and Titanium Interbodies Using GE Additive’s Mlab Printer.
Osseointegration. J Mater Chem B, 7:2865–77. Available from: https://3dadept.com/nexxt-spine-creates-
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TB00093C. 3d-printed-porous-titanium-interbodies-using-ge-additives-
118. Bose S, Banerjee D, Shivaram A, et al., 2018, Calcium mlab-printer/. [Last accessed on 2020 Nov 30].
Phosphate Coated 3D Printed Porous Titanium with 128. Semba JA, Mieloch AA, Rybka JD, 2020, Introduction to
Nanoscale Surface Modification for Orthopedic and Dental the State-of-the-art 3D Bioprinting Methods, Design, and
Applications. Mater Des, 2018:S0264127518303198. Applications in Orthopedics. Bioprinting, 18:e00070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00070.
119. Ran Q, Yang W, Hu Y, et al., 2018, Osteogenesis of 3D 129. Shah FA, Omar O, Suska F, et al., 2016, Long-term
Printed Porous Ti6Al4V Implants with Different Pore Sizes. Osseointegration of 3D Printed CoCr Constructs with an
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 84:1–11. Interconnected Open-pore Architecture Prepared by Electron
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.010. Beam Melting. Acta Biomater, 36:296–309.
120. Liu F, Mao Z, Zhang P, et al., 2018, Functionally Graded https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.033.
Porous Scaffolds in Multiple Patterns: New Design Method, 130. Limmahakhun S, Oloyede A, Sitthiseripratip K, et al., 2017,
Physical and Mechanical Properties. Mater Des, 160:849–60. Stiffness and Strength Tailoring of Cobalt Chromium Graded
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.053. Cellular Structures for Stress-shielding Reduction. Mater
121. Bobbert FS, Lietaert K, Eftekhari AA, et al., 2017, Additively Des, 114:633–41.
Manufactured Metallic Porous Biomaterials Based on Minimal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.090.
Surfaces: A Unique Combination of Topological, Mechanical, 131. Black J, 1994, Biologic Performance of Tantalum. Clin
and Mass Transport Properties. Acta Biomater, 53:572–84. Mater, 16:167–73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(94)90113-9.
122. Wally ZJ, Haque AM, Feteira A, et al., 2019, Selective Laser 132. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, et al., 2006, Experimental
Melting Processed Ti6Al4V Lattices with Graded Porosities and Clinical Performance of Porous Tantalum in Orthopedic

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 7 45