Page 81 - IJB-7-1
P. 81
Jing, et al.
Electrohydrodynamic Jet Printing. Small, 11:4237–66. Shell Nanofiber Membranes Via Coaxial Electrospinning
http://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201500593. for Guided Tissue Regeneration. J Colloid Interface Sci,
12. Liu H, Vijayavenkataraman S, Wang D, et al., 2017, 490:270–8.
Influence of Electrohydrodynamic Jetting Parameters on the http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.062.
Morphology of PCL Scaffolds. Int J Bioprint, 3:72–82. 21. Urade R, Sato N, Sugiyama M, 2018, Gliadins from
http://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2017.01.009. Wheat Grain: An Overview, from Primary Structure to
13. Guvendiren M, Molde J, Soares RMD, et al., 2016, Designing Nanostructures of Aggregates. Biophys Rev, 10:435–43.
Biomaterials for 3D Printing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2:1679–93. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-017-0367-2.
http://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121. 22. Koning F, 2015, Adverse Effects of Wheat Gluten. Ann Nutr
14. Sun J, Vijayavenkataraman S, Liu H, 2017, An Overview of Metab, 67 Suppl 2:8–14.
Scaffold Design and Fabrication Technology for Engineered 23. Jing L, Wang X, Liu H, et al., 2018, Zein Increases the
Knee Meniscus. Materials (Basel), 10:29. Cytoaffinity and Biodegradability of Scaffolds 3D-Printed
http://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010029. with Zein and Poly(epsilon-caprolactone) Composite Ink.
15. Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW, 2010, The Return of a ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:18551–9.
Forgotten Polymer Polycaprolactone in the 21 Century. Prog http://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04344.s001.
st
Polym Sci, 35:1217–56. 24. Sun J, Hong GS, Rahman M, et al., 2005, Improved Performance
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002. Evaluation of Tool Condition Identification by Manufacturing
16. Lam CX, Hutmacher DW, Schantz JT, et al., 2009, Evaluation Loss Consideration. Int J Prod Res, 43:1185–204.
of Polycaprolactone Scaffold Degradation for 6 Months 25. Jie S, Hong GS, Rahman M, et al., 2002, Feature Extraction
In Vitro and In Vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A, 90:906–19. and Selection in Tool Condition Monitoring System. In:
17. Wan ZL, Guo J, Yang XQ, 2015, Plant Protein-based Delivery Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,
Systems for Bioactive Ingredients in Foods. Food Funct, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 487-497.
6:2876–89. http://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36187-1_43.
http://doi.org/10.1039/c5fo00050e. 26. Castro AG, Diba M, Kersten M, et al., 2018, Development of
18. Anderson TJ, Lamsal BP, 2011, REVIEW: Zein Extraction a PCL-silica Nanoparticles Composite Membrane for Guided
from Corn, Corn Products, and Coproducts and Modifications Bone Regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,
for Various Applications: A Review. Cereal Chem J, 88:159–73. 85:154–61.
http://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-06-10-0091. 27. Meshel AS, Wei Q, Adelstein RS, et al., 2005, Basic
19. Paliwal R, Palakurthi S, 2014, Zein in Controlled Drug Delivery Mechanism of Three-dimensional Collagen Fibre Transport
and Tissue Engineering. J Control Release, 189:108–22. by Fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol, 7:157–64.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.036. http://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1216.
20. He M, Jiang H, Wang R, et al., 2017, Fabrication of 28. Reddy N, Yang Y, 2011, Potential of Plant Proteins for
Metronidazole Loaded Poly (ε-Caprolactone)/Zein Core/ Medical Applications. Trends Biotechnol, 29:490–8.
International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 1 77

