Page 41 - IJB-7-3
P. 41

REVIEW ARTICLE

           3D Bioprinting Photo-Crosslinkable Hydrogels for Bone

           and Cartilage Repair


           Quanjing Mei , Jingdong Rao , Ho Pan Bei , Yaxiong Liu , Xin Zhao *
                                         1,†
                                                        1
                         1,†
                                                                                 1
                                                                      2
           1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China
           2 Jihua Laboratory, Foshan, Guangdong, China
           † These authors contributed equally to this work
           Abstract: Three-dimensional  (3D) bioprinting  has become  a  promising  strategy  for bone  manufacturing,  with excellent
           control over geometry and microarchitectures of the scaffolds. The bioprinting ink for bone and cartilage engineering has
           thus become the key to developing 3D constructs for bone and cartilage defect repair. Maintaining the balance of cellular
           viability, drugs or cytokines’ function, and mechanical integrity is critical for constructing 3D bone and/or cartilage scaffolds.
           Photo-crosslinkable  hydrogel is one of the  most promising  materials  in tissue engineering;  it  can respond to light  and
           induce structural or morphological transition. The biocompatibility, easy fabrication, as well as controllable mechanical and
           degradation properties of photo-crosslinkable hydrogel can meet various requirements of the bone and cartilage scaffolds,
           which enable it to serve as an effective bio-ink for 3D bioprinting. Here, in this review, we first introduce commonly used
           photo-crosslinkable hydrogel materials and additives (such as nanomaterials, functional cells, and drugs/cytokine), and then
           discuss  the  applications  of  the  3D  bioprinted  photo-crosslinkable  hydrogel  scaffolds  for  bone  and  cartilage  engineering.
           Finally, we conclude the review with future perspectives about the development  of 3D bioprinting photo-crosslinkable
           hydrogels in bone and cartilage engineering.
           Keywords: Bone and cartilage engineering; Hydrogel; Photo-crosslinking; Three-dimensional printing

           *Correpondence to: Xin Zhao, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China;
           xin.zhao@polyu.edu.hk
           Received: April 1, 2021; Accepted: May 31, 2021; Published Online: June 24, 2021
           (This Article Belongs To The Special Section: Bioprinting of 3D Functional Tissue Constructs)
           Citation: Mei Q, Rao J, Bei HP, Liu X, Zhao X, et al., 2021, 3D Bioprinting Photo-crosslinkable Hydrogels for Bone and
           Cartilage Repair. Int J Bioprint, 7(3):367. http://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i3.367

           1. Introduction                                     of native tissue-mimicking structure and the inability to
                                                               establish  a  three-dimensional  (3D)  niche  for  different
           The incidence of skeletal disorders involving both bone   cell types (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and endothelial cells
           and cartilage caused by trauma, injuries, and dysfunction   [EC]) . Bone and cartilage are highly complex anisotropic
                                                                   [4]
           has significantly increased in recent decades, creating a   tissues with distinctive structures, various compositions,
           demand for more effective treatment . Despite decades   and excellent mechanical properties. The repair of bone
                                          [1]
           of study, the treatments  for large bone and cartilage   and  cartilage  involves  cell  migration,  extracellular
           defects remain a significant clinical problem . Although   matrix  (ECM)  remodeling,  and  tissue  regeneration,  of
                                                [2]
           traditional  methods such as autografts, allografts  and   which both functional  details and structures should be
           xenografts have been developed for repairing these   carefully considered when developing bone and cartilage
           defects,  they  all  suffer  corresponding  restrictions,   constructs .
                                                                       [5]
           including  limited  supply,  insufficient  function,  and   3D bioprinting, which not only provides
           immune response .  Hence,  synthetic  biomaterials  are   adjustable  3D organizational  structures but also
                          [3]
           developed as alternatives; however, they often fail to be   encapsulates cells and growth factors, brings forth a new
           properly integrated into the recipient sites due to the lack   strategy  to  design  biomimetic  scaffolds  for  bone  and

           © 2021 Mei, et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons. org/
           licenses/by/4.0/), permitting distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is cited.
                                                                                                            37
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46