Page 80 - IJB-7-3
P. 80

Fabrication of Layered Gradient Brain-like Tissue by 3D Bioprinting
            A                                               B
















            C













           Figure 4. Effect of different pre-cooling time at 4℃ on the performance of the G6A1C1 bio-inks. (A) Curve of viscosity and shear rate
           of the mixed bio-inks. (B) Outflow state of the bio-inks. (C) The micro-morphology of the printed structures printed by the bio-inks with
           different pre-cooling time.

           3.2. Determining the printing parameters of the     Table  3. Range  and  variance  analysis  data  of line  width  of the
           G6A1C1 bio-ink                                      printed structure
                                                               Type of data        Factor A Factor B Factor C
           The G6A1C1 bio-ink was used to print a single-      processing
           layer grid structure with side length of 12  mm and
           spacing  of  2  mm.  The  order  of  the  influence  of  the   Range analysis  730.73  856.53  1213.13
                                                                k1
           printing parameters on the line width (Table  3) and
           forming  accuracy  (Table  4)  of  the  printed  structure   k2          761.60   786.60    559.40
           was as follows: Needle diameter D > moving speed v   k3                  811.60   660.80    531.40
                                                                                                       653.73
                                                                                             195.73
                                                                Range
                                                                                     80.87
           > extrusion rate u. Needle diameter D (P < 0.01) and
           moving speed v (P <0.05) had significant effects on the   Sequence       C>B>A      B3        C3
                                                                Optimal levels
                                                                                      A1
           line width. These three factors had no significant effect   Optimal combination A1B3C3
           on the forming accuracy.
               According to the results of these two evaluation   Variance analysis  4996.1  29513.9  446455.8
                                                                Mean-square value
           indexes, the optimal printing parameter for the G6A1C1   F value          5.397   31.883   482.298
           bio-ink to print the single-layer structure was chosen
           as follows: The diameter D of the needle was 27G, the   Significance level   ---(0.156)  *(0.030)  **(0.002)
                                                                (P value)
           moving speed v was 15 mm/s, and the extrusion rate u was
           60 μl/min. When using this printing parameter to print a   3.3. Effect of post-processing on the performance
           multi-layer structure, it was found that the extruded inks   of the printed structure
           could not deposit continuously due to the fast-moving
           speed  (Figure  5D).  Therefore, it  was  necessary to   (1) Effect of temperature on the performance of the
           optimize the printing parameters when printing a multi-  printed structures
           layer structure. The continuity and stability of the printed
           multilayer structure can be guaranteed by reducing the   G6A1C1 bio-ink was used to print a grid structure with
           moving speed (Figure 6). Therefore, according to the   15 layers. The printed structure was immersed into a
           experimental results, the printing parameters of multi   solution containing 1% CaCl  for 30 min at 20°C and
                                                                                        2
           layer structure were determined as shown in Table 5.  37°C, respectively.  The compression modulus of the
           76                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85