Page 101 - IJB-7-4
P. 101

Zhang, et al.
               Bioink. Nat Commun, 5:3935.                         Characterization of 3D Contractile Smooth Muscle Tissues
           31.  Fedorovich  NE,  De  Wijn  JR,  Verbout  AJ,  et  al., 2008,   Generated  Using  a  Unique  Microfluidic  3D  Bioprinting
               Three-dimensional  Fiber  Deposition of Cell-laden,  Viable,   Technology. FASEB J, 34:1652–64.
               Patterned Constructs for Bone  Tissue Printing.  Tissue Eng   43.  Stanco D, Boffito M, Bogni A, et al., 2002, 3D Bioprinting
               Part A, 14:127–33.                                  of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells and Their Tenogenic
           32.  Abaci  A,  Guvendiren  M,  202,  Designing  Decellularized   Differentiation  in  Clinical-Grade  Medium.  Int  J  Mol  Sci,
               Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv   21:8694.
               Healthc Mater, 2020:e2000734.                   44.  Sawkins MJ, Bowen W, Dhadda P, et al., 2013, Hydrogels
           33.  Shin  YJ,  Shafranek  RT,  Tsui  JH,  et  al., 3D Bioprinting   Derived  from  Demineralized  and  Decellularized  Bone
               of  Mechanically  Tuned  Bioinks  Derived  from  Cardiac   Extracellular Matrix. Acta Biomater, 9:7865–73.
               Decellularized  Extracellular  Matrix.  Acta  Biomater,   45.  Zhang  X,  Zhai  C,  Fei  H,  et  al., 2018, Composite  Silk-
               1;119:75–88.                                        Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds for Enhanced Chondrogenesis
           34.  Lee H, Yang GH, Kim N, et al., 2018, Fabrication of Micro/  of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.  Tissue Eng Part  C Methods,
               Nanoporous   Collagen/dECM/Silk-fibroin   Biocomposite   24:645–58.
               Scaffolds Using a Low Temperature 3D Printing Process for   46.  Chenjun  Z,  Qiang  Z,  Kai  S,  et al.,  2002,  Utilizing  an
               Bone Tissue Regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,   Integrated  Tri-layered  Scaffold  with  Titanium-Mesh-Cage
               84:140–7.                                           Base  to  Repair  Cartilage  Defects  of  Knee  in  Goat  Model.
           35.  Yang Q, Peng J, Guo Q, et al., 2008, A Cartilage ECM-derived   Mater Des, 193:108766.
               3-D Porous Acellular Matrix Scaffold for In Vivo Cartilage   47.  Zhai  C,  Fei  H,  Hu  J,  et al., 2018, Repair of  Articular
               Tissue Engineering with PKH26-labeled Chondrogenic Bone   Osteochondral Defects Using an Integrated and Biomimetic
               Marrow-derived  Mesenchymal  Stem  Cells.  Biomaterials,   Trilayered Scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A, 24:1680–92.
               29:2378–87.                                     48.  Crapo  PM,  Gilbert  TW,  Badylak  SF,  2011,  An  Overview
           36.  Jang J, Kim TG, Kim BS, et al., 2016, Tailoring Mechanical   of  Tissue and  Whole Organ Decellularization  Processes.
               Properties of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink by   Biomaterials, 32:3233–43.
               Vitamin B2-Induced Photo-Crosslinking. Acta Biomaterialia,   49.  Schacht K, Jungst T, Schweinlin M, et al., 2015, Biofabrication
               33:88–95.                                           of Cell-loaded 3D Spider Silk Constructs. Angew Chem Int
           37.  Zhang X, Liu Y, Luo C, et al., 2002, Crosslinker-free Silk/  Ed Engl, 54:2816–20.
               Decellularized  Extracellular  Matrix Porous Bioink for 3D   50.  Ni T, Liu M, Zhang Y, et al., 2002, 3D Bioprinting of Bone
               Bioprinting-based Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Mater Eng   Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Laden Silk Fibroin Double
               C, 2020:111388.                                     Network  Scaffolds  for  Cartilage  Tissue  Repair.  Bioconjug
           38.  Li Z, Zhang X, Yuan T, et al., 2020, Addition of Platelet-Rich   Chem, 31:1938–47.
               Plasma  to  Silk  Fibroin  Hydrogel  Bioprinting  for  Cartilage   51.  Chawla  S,  Midha  S,  Sharma  A,  et  al.,  2018,  Silk-Based
               Regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A, 26:886–95.         Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:e1701204.
           39.  Gupta S, Alrabaiah H, Christophe M, et al., 2020, Evaluation   52.  Ding C, Qiao Z, Jiang W, et al., 2013, Regeneration of a Goat
               of Silk-based Bioink during  Pre and Post  3D  Bioprinting:   Femoral  Head  Using  a  Tissue-specific,  Biphasic  Scaffold
               A Review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 109:279–93.  Fabricated  with  CAD/CAM  Technology.  Biomaterials,
           40.  Almeida HV, Liu Y, Cunniffe GM, et al., 2014, Controlled   34:6706–16.
               Release  of  Transforming  Growth  Factor-beta3  from   53.  Cals FL, Hellingman CA, Koevoet W, et al., 2012, Effects
               Cartilage-extra-cellular-matrix-derived Scaffolds to Promote   of  Transforming  Growth  Factor-beta  Subtypes  on  In Vitro
               Chondrogenesis  of  Human-joint-tissue-derived  Stem  Cells.   Cartilage  Production  and  Mineralization  of  Human  Bone
               Acta Biomater, 10:4400–9.                           Marrow Stromal-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. J Tissue
           41.  Almeida HV, Cunniffe GM, Vinardell T, et al., 2015, Coupling   Eng Regen Med, 6:68–76.
               Freshly  Isolated  CD44(+)  Infrapatellar  Fat  Pad-Derived   54.  Freeman FE, Pitacco P, van Dommelen LH, et al., 2002, 3D
               Stromal  Cells  with  a  TGF-beta3  Eluting  Cartilage  ECM-  Bioprinting  Spatiotemporally  Defined  Patterns  of  Growth
               Derived Scaffold as a Single-Stage Strategy for Promoting   Factors to  Tightly Control  Tissue Regeneration.  Sci Adv,
               Chondrogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater, 4:1043–53.       6:eabb5093.
           42.  Dickman CT, Russo  V,  Thain K,  et al., 2002, Functional   55.  Datta S, Rameshbabu  AP, Bankoti K,  et al., 2021,

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4        97
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106