Page 100 - IJB-7-4

3D Printing Osteochondral Scaffold
3. Hu J, Zou WZ, Li L, et al., 2020, Overexpressing Runx2 of 16. Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print Me An Organ! Why
BMSCs Improve the Repairment of Knee Cartilage Defects. We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145.
Curr Gene Ther, 20:395–404. 17. Liu N, Ye X, Yao B, et al., 2021, Advances in 3D Bioprinting
4. Stefani RM, Barbosa S, Tan AR, et al., 2002, Pulsed Technology for Cardiac Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.
Electromagnetic Fields Promote Repair of Focal Articular Bioact Mater, 6:1388–401.
Cartilage Defects with Engineered Osteochondral Constructs. 18. Osidak EO, Kozhukhov VI, Osidak MS, et al., 2020, Collagen
Biotechnol Bioeng, 117:1584–96. as Bioink for Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review. Int J
5. Levingstone TJ, Ramesh A, Brady RY, et al., 2016, Cell-free Bioprint, 6:270.
Multi-layered Collagen-based Scaffolds Demonstrate Layer 19. Lee JM, Sing SL, Yeong WY, 2002, Bioprinting of
Specific Regeneration of Functional Osteochondral Tissue in Multimaterials with Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided
Caprine Joints. Biomaterials, 87:69–81. Manufacturing. Int J Bioprint, 6:245.
6. Khanarian NT, Haney NM, Burga RA, et al., 2012, A Functional 20. Gantumur E, Nakahata M, Kojima M, et al., 2002, Extrusion-
Agarose-hydroxyapatite Scaffold for Osteochondral Interface Based Bioprinting through Glucose-Mediated Enzymatic
Regeneration. Biomaterials, 33:5247–58. Hydrogelation. Int J Bioprint, 6:250.
7. Abdollahiyan P, Oroojalian F, Mokhtarzadeh A, et al., 2002, 21. Askari M, Naniz MA, Kouhi M, et al., 2020, Recent Progress
Hydrogel-Based 3D Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage in Extrusion 3D Bioprinting of Hydrogel Biomaterials for
Tissue Engineering. Biotechnol J, 2020:e2000095. Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review with Focus on
8. Abasalizadeh F, Moghaddam SV, Alizadeh E, et al., 2020, Advanced Fabrication Techniques. Biomater Sci, 9:535–573.
Alginate-based Hydrogels as Drug Delivery Vehicles in 22. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet Bioprinting of
Cancer Treatment and their Applications in Wound Dressing Biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120:10793–833.
and 3D Bioprinting. J Biol Eng, 14:8. 23. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2002, Vat Polymerization-
9. Zuo Q, Cui W, Liu F, et al., 2016, Utilizing Tissue-engineered based Bioprinting-process, Materials, Applications and
Cartilage or BMNC-PLGA Composites to Fill Empty Spaces Regulatory Challenges. Biofabrication, 12:022001.
during Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty in Porcine 24. Vurat MT, Ergun C, Elcin AE, et al., 2002, 3D Bioprinting of
Knees. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 10:916–26. Tissue Models with Customized Bioinks. Adv Exp Med Biol,
10. Cui W, Wang Q, Chen G, et al., 2011, Repair of Articular 1249:67–84.
Cartilage Defects with Tissue-engineered Osteochondral 25. Ning L, Mehta R, Cao C, et al., 2020, Embedded 3D
Composites in Pigs. J Biosci Bioeng, 111:493–500. Bioprinting of Gelatin Methacryloyl-Based Constructs
11. Qiao Z, Lian M, Han Y, et al., 2021, Bioinspired Stratified with Highly Tunable Structural Fidelity. ACS Appl Mater
Electrowritten Fiber-reinforced Hydrogel Constructs Interfaces, 12:44563–577.
with Layer-specific Induction Capacity for Functional 26. Bicho D, Ajami S, Liu C, et al., 2019, Peptide-
Osteochondral Regeneration. Biomaterials, 266:120385. biofunctionalization of Biomaterials for Osteochondral
12. Cao R, Zhan A, Ci Z, et al., 2021, A Biomimetic Biphasic Tissue Regeneration in Early Stage Osteoarthritis: Challenges
Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Cartilage and and Opportunities. J Mater Chem B, 7:1027–44.
Decalcified Bone Matrixes for Osteochondral Defect Repair. 27. Gan D, Xu T, Xing W, et al., 2019, Mussel-inspired
Front Cell Dev Biol, 9:639006. Dopamine Oligomer Intercalated tough and Resilient
13. Ashammakhi N, Ahadian S, Xu C, et al., 2019, Bioinks Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels for Cartilage
and Bioprinting Technologies to Make Heterogeneous and Regeneration. J Mater Chem B, 7:1716–25.
Biomimetic Tissue Constructs. Mater Today Bio, 1:100008. 28. Mishbak HH, Cooper G, Bartolo PJ, 2019, Development
14. Antich C, de Vicente J, Jimenez G, et al., 2002, Bio-inspired and Characterization of a Photocurable Alginate Bioink for
Hydrogel Composed of Hyaluronic Acid and Alginate as a Three-dimensional Bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 5:189.
Potential Bioink for 3D Bioprinting of Articular Cartilage 29. Chang R, Nam J, Sun W, 2008, Effects of Dispensing Pressure
Engineering Constructs. Acta Biomater, 106:114–23. and Nozzle Diameter on Cell Survival from Solid Freeform
15. Zhang W, Ling C, Zhang A, et al., 2020, An All-silk-derived Fabrication-based Direct Cell Writing. Tissue Eng Part A,
Functional Nanosphere Matrix for Sequential Biomolecule 14:41–8.
Delivery and In Situ Osteochondral Regeneration. Bioact 30. Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, et al., 2014, Printing Three-dimensional
Mater, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 832-843, 2020. Tissue Analogues with Decellularized Extracellular Matrix

96 International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4