Page 11 - IJB-7-4
P. 11

Zhuang, et al.
               Integrating acoustics with microfluidics and acoustic   perfusion flow that could improve oxygen and nutrient
           fluidics  have  found  many  applications  in  cell  sorting   transportation, sustaining long-term cell culture [107,108] .
           and separation . This acoustic-based cell manipulation   These continuous flow-based microfluidic platforms
                       [86]
           technique  is non-invasive  and label-free.  By guiding   frequently use and require syringe pumps, whereas digital
           surface acoustic waves (SAW) to a microfluidic chamber,   microfluidic  platforms  can  optimally  dispense  pico-  to
           Chen  et  al. had  demonstrated  spheroid formation,   micro-liter droplets on an electromechanical apparatus;
           while simultaneously patterning through a designed 3D   therefore, digital microfluidic platform are more portable
           acoustic tweezer platform . Guo et al. had developed a   and cost-effective [109-111] . Through tight control over fluidic
                                [47]
           high-throughput acoustic fluidic platform for large-scale   flow,  microfluidic  platforms  allow  the  generation  of
           spheroid formation . By acoustically assembling cancer   monodispersed droplets with uniform spheroid formation
                           [87]
           cells, this platform enables high throughput fabrication of   coupling a high throughput production output [112,113] .
           6000 tumor spheroids per batch within 24 h.
                                                               3.7. 3D Bioprinting techniques
           3.6. Microfluidic platforms                         Despite  the  broad  utilization  of extrusion-based
           By manipulating fluid flow between micro- and nano-  bioprinting  in building  3D tissue constructs, strong
           scales  within  microchannels,  microfluidic  platforms   interests in inkjet-based bioprinting have been growing
           have evolved as powerful tools that could possibly   substantially  in recent  decades.  The  capability  of a
           miniaturize  significant  experimental  processes  onto   “drop-on-demand” style printing to accurately dispense
           a  microfluidic  chip  less  than  the  size  of  a  finger [88] .   discrete  spheroids makes  this technique  appealing  for
           Droplet-based   microfluidics,   which   generates   high-throughput spheroid formation (Figure 2A-g). By
           discrete  droplets  via  immiscible  multiphase  flows   dispensing the cell  droplets into an alginate  hydrogel
           inside  microfluidic  devices,  have  gained  substantial   matrix  residing  within  a  96-well  plate,  through
           interest in past decades.  Through adjustments to the   microvalve-based printing, Utama et al. had successfully
           flow  rate  of  immiscible  fluids,  this  method  enables   generated spheroids using 3 different cell types, including
           generation of highly monodispersed droplets with a   neuroblastoma (SK-N-BE(2)), non-small cell lung cancer
           production speed spanning from 10-1000 droplets per   (H460), and glioblastoma (U87vIII) cells [114] . The size of
           second [89] . Typically,  there  are  3  types  of  microfluidic   these printed spheroids was controlled by adjusting the
           configurations  for  passive  droplet  generation:  cross-  initial printing cell density and incubation time, as well as
           flowing/T  junction [90,91] ,  flow-focusing [92-95] , and co-  the confinement of the printed hydrogel matrix. Evidenced
           flowing  droplet  formation [96] . Flow-focusing with   by the expression of Ki67, HIF-1α, and apoptotic marker
           single-, double-, and multiple-emulsion designs have   cleaved caspase-3, the 3D-printed SK-N-BE(2) spheroids
           been extensively utilized (Figure 2A-f) [97-99] . As a result,   exhibited similar tumor-like characteristics that resemble
           cell-encapsulated capsules with a template of water-in-  manually formed spheroids. Similar level of CD133
           oil (w/o), oil-in-water-in-oil (o/w/o), water-in-water-in-  expression was found in both 3D printed and manually
           oil (w/w/o), and water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) could be   generated neuroblastoma spheroids, indicating a similar
           produced [100,101] . By assigning different materials and/or   preservation of cancer stemness between both types of
           cells to replace each individual phase, microcapsules   spheroids.  Therapeutic  efficacy  was  also  examined  by
           displaying varied cell/material arrangements could be   doxorubicin (DOX) treatment for 2 h. DOX penetration
           tailored for diverse applications [102] . For instance, with   was found on the periphery of both types of prepared
           a  double-emulsion,  flow-focusing  microfluidic  device,   spheroids, which are also frequently observed in tumors.
           Agarwal et al. had developed core-shell microcapsules   These results collectively  demonstrated  the capability
           with embryonic stem cell-laden carboxymethyl cellulose   of 3D printed spheroids in recapitulating the biological
           and alginate in the core and shell, respectively. Other than   features of tumors.
           alginate [98] , hydrogels such as chitosan, thermosensitive   Taking  advantage  of  the  thermal  property  of
           gelatin, agarose, Matrigel, collagen, P(NIPAM-AA),   gelatin  hydrogel,  Ling  et  al. had fabricated  concave
           photoinitiative gelatin methacrylate (gelMA), PEGDA,   wells molded from a polyethylene glycol-dimethacrylate
           and hyaluronic acid-MA have all been examined for   (PEG-DMA) array, with in situ seeding of human breast
           facilitating spheroid formation and growth [94] . In addition   cancer cell-laden gelatin for cellular spheroid formation
           to droplet-based microfludics, lab-on-a-chip technology   on a chip [115] . However, challenges  associated  with
           also can integrate hanging drop networks  [103-105] ,   droplet inconsistency, low cell density, easy nozzle
           microwell [50,106] , U-shape microstructure, or micropillar   blockage, and physical stresses on cells limit the range
           into the platforms for spheroid formation and on-chip   of this  technique’s applicability.  Alternatively, laser-
           culture. Microfluidic platforms outperform conventional   based bioprinting also enables droplet-based printing for
           static culture methods through the introduction of a   single cell manipulation or 3D spheroid formation [116,117] .

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4         7
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16