Page 63 - IJB-7-4
P. 63

Lin, et al.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/md12125881                  Reliability  of Silicone Meniscus Implants.  3D  Print Addit
           53.  Hinton  TJ,  Jallerat  Q,  Palchesko  RN,  et al.,  2015,  Three-  Manufact, 6:319–32.
               dimensional Printing  of  Complex Biological Structures  By      https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2018.0226
               Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogels.   63.  Rahmanian  M,  Seyfoori  A,  Dehghan  MM,  et al., 2019,
               Sci Adv, 1:e1500758.                                Multifunctional  Gelatin-Tricalcium  Phosphate  Porous
               https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500758              Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Local
           54.  Campos DF, Blaeser A, Korsten A, et al., 2015, The Stiffness   Drug Delivery: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. J Taiwan Inst
               and Structure of Three-dimensional Printed Hydrogels Direct   Chem Eng, 101:214–20.
               the  Differentiation  of  Mesenchymal  Stromal  Cells  toward      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2019.04.028
               Adipogenic and Osteogenic Lineages.  Tissue Eng Part  A,   64.  Tibbits S, 2014, 4D Printing: Multi‐Material Shape Change.
               21:740–56.                                          Arch Des, 84:116–21.
               https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0231           https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1710
           55.  Shim JH, Jang KM, Hahn SK, et al., 2016, Three-dimensional   65.  Lee JM, Yeong WY, 2016, Design and Printing Strategies in
               Bioprinting  of Multilayered  Constructs Containing  Human   3D Bioprinting of Cell-Hydrogels: A Review. Adv Healthc
               Mesenchymal  Stromal  Cells  for Osteochondral  Tissue   Mater, 5:2856–65.
               Regeneration  in the Rabbit Knee Joint.  Biofabrication,      https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600435
               8:014102.                                       66.  Vorndran E, Klammert U, Ewald A, et al., 2010, Simultaneous
               https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0231           Immobilization  of Bioactives  During 3D Powder Printing
           56.  Almarza  AJ,  Athanasiou  KA,  2004,  Seeding  Techniques   of  Bioceramic  Drug‐Release  Matrices.  Adv Funct  Mater,
               and  Scaffolding  Choice  for  Tissue  Engineering  of  the   20:1585–91.
               Temporomandibular Joint Disk.  Tissue Eng Part  A,      https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200901759
               10:1787–95.                                     67.  Chia HN, Wu BM, 2015, Recent Advances in 3D Printing of
               https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1787            Biomaterials. J Biol Eng, 9:4.
           57.  Li L, Li J, Guo J, et al., 2019, 3D Molecularly Functionalized      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4
               Cell-Free   Biomimetic   Scaffolds   for   Osteochondral   68.  Liu X, Ma PX, 2004, Polymeric Scaffolds for Bone Tissue
               Regeneration. Adv Funct Mater, 29:1807356.          Engineering. Biomaterials, 32:9622–9.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201807356              https://doi.org/10.1023/b: abme.0000017544.36001.8e
           58.  Hasani-Sadrabadi  MM,  Sarrion  P,  Nakatsuka  N,  et al.,   69.  Peltola SM, Melchels F, Grijpma DW, et al., 2008, A Review
               2019,  Hierarchically  Patterned  Polydopamine-Containing   of  Rapid  Prototyping  Techniques  for  Tissue  Engineering
               Membranes for Periodontal Tissue Engineering. Acs Nano,   Purposes. Ann Med 40:268–80.
               13:3830–8.                                          https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890701881788
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09623         70.  Bajpai I, Yang S, Lee S, et al., 2015, Compressive Strength
           59.  Yi WJ, Li LJ, He H, et al., 2018, Poly(L-lactide)/Cyclodextrin/  and Biomineralisation Improvement by Water Glass Coating
               Citrate Networks Modified Hydroxyapatite and its Role as   on Porous Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds. Adv Appl Ceramics,
               Filler in the Promotion to the Properties of Poly(L-lactide)   115:243–8.
               Biomaterials. Polymer, 145:1–10.                    https://doi.org/10.1179/1743676115Y.0000000028
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j. olymer.2018.04.034   71.  Shuai  CJ,  Yuan  X,  Yang  WJ,  et al., 2021, Synthesis of a
           60.  O’Bryan  CS,  Bhattacharjee  T,  Hart  S,  et  al.,  2017,  Self-  Mace-like  Cellulose  [Emailprotected]  Nanosystem  Via  In-
               assembled  Micro-Organogels  for  3D  Printing  Silicone   Situ  Growth  for  Antibacterial  Activities  of  Poly-L-lactide
               Structures. Sci Adv, 3:1602800.                     scaffold. Carbohydr Polym, 262:117937.
               https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602800              https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117937
           61.  Chow  L,  Yick  KL,  Kwan  MY,  et  al., 2020, Customized   72.  Zyman ZZ, Tkachenko MV, Polevodin DV, 2008, Preparation
               Fabrication Approach for Hypertrophic Scar Treatment: 3D   and  Characterization  of Biphasic  Calcium  Phosphate
               Printed Fabric Silicone Composite. Int J Bioprint, 6:70–81.  Ceramics of Desired Composition. J Mater Sci Mater Med,
               https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i2.262               19:2819–25.
           62.  Luis E, Pan HM, Sing SL, et al., 2019, Silicone 3D Printing:      https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3402-9
               Process Optimization,  Product  Biocompatibility,  and   73.  de  Wild  M,  Amacher  F,  Bradbury  CR,  et  al.,  2016,

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4        59
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68