Page 62 - IJB-7-4

Filament Structure, 3D printing, Bone Repair Scaffolds
30. Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al., 2017, Direct 3D Bioprinting 42. Huang MH, Shen YF, Hsu TT, et al., 2016. Physical
of Prevascularized Tissue Constructs with Complex Characteristics, Antimicrobial and Odontogenesis Potentials
Microarchitecture. Biomaterials, 124:106–15. of Calcium Silicate Cement Containing Hinokitiol. Mater Sci
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042 Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 65:1–8.
31. Tang Z, Li X, Tan Y, et al., 2017, The Material and Biological https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.016
Characteristics of Osteoinductive Calcium Phosphate 43. Shie M, Chiang W, Chen I, et al., 2017, Synergistic
Ceramics. Regener. Biomater. 5:43–59. Acceleration in the Osteogenic and Angiogenic Differentiation
https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbx024 of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Calcium Silicate-
32. Damien CJ, Parsons JR, 1991, Bone Graft Substitutes: Graphene Composites. Mater Sci Eng C, 73:726–35.
A Review of Current Technology and Applications. Autumn https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.071
(Fall). 2:187–208. 44. Bittner SM, Guo JL, Melchiorri A, et al., 2018, Three-
https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.770020307 dimensional Printing of Multilayered Tissue Engineering
33. Oonishi H, 1991, Orthopaedic Applications of Hydroxyapatite. Scaffolds. Mater Today, 21:861–74.
Biomaterials, 12:171–8. 45. Sant S, Coutinho F, Gaharwar AK, et al., 2017, Self‐
https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90196-H Assembled Hydrogel Fiber Bundles from Oppositely
34. Lowe B, Hardy JG, Walsh LJ, 2020, Optimizing Charged Polyelectrolytes Mimic Micro/Nanoscale Hierarchy
Nanohydroxyapatite Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue of Collagen. Adv Funct Mater, 27:1606273.
Engineering. ACS Omega, 5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.006
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02917 46. Daniela L, Christoph M, Elke K, et al., 2016, Functionalization,
35. Desiraju GR, Hulliger J, 2001, Current Opinion in Solid State Preparation and Use of Cell-laden Gelatin Methacryloyl-
and Materials Science: Molecular Crystals and Materials. based Hydrogels as Modular Tissue Culture Platforms. Nat
Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 5:105–6. Protoc Erec Res, 11:727–46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-0286(01)00015-8 https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.037
36. Li S, Liu Y, Zhang Q, et al., 2011, Microwave-assisted Co- 47. Ying G, Jiang N, Maharjan S, et al., 2018, Bioprinting:
precipitation Synthesis of High Purity β-tricalcium Phosphate Aqueous Two-Phase Emulsion Bioink-Enabled 3D
Crystalline Powders. Mater Chem Phys, 129:1138–41. Bioprinting of Porous Hydrogels. Adv Mater, 30:1870382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.05.075 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805460
37. Chen Z, Li Z, Li J, et al., 2018, 3D Printing of Ceramics: 48. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, et al., 2017, 3D Printing of
A Review. J Eur Ceramic Soc, 39:661–87. Polymer Matrix Composites: A Review and Prospective.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 Comp Part B Eng, 110:442–58.
38. Jones JR, 2013, Review of Bioactive Glass: From Hench to https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
Hybrids. Acta Biomater, 9:4457–86. 49. Takezawa A, Kobashi M, 2017, Design Methodology
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 for Porous Composites with Tunable Thermal Expansion
39. Fujishiro Y, Hench LL, Oonishi H, 1997, Quantitative Rates Produced by Multi-Material Topology Optimization and
of In Vivo Bone Generation for Bioglass and Hydroxyapatite Additive Manufacturing. Comp Part B Eng, 131:21–9.
Particles as Bone Graft Substitute. J Mater Sci Mater Med, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.054
8:649–52. 50. Li J, Xing R, Bai S, et al., 2019 Recent Advances of Self-
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018527621356 assembling Peptide-based Hydrogels for Biomedical
40. Ducheyne P, 2010, Bioglass Coatings and Bioglass Applications. Soft Matter, 30:1704–15.
Composites as Implant Materials. J Biomed Mater Res https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sm02573h
Part A, 19:273–91. 51. Pataky K, Braschler T, Negro A, et al., 2012, Microdrop
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820190309 Printing of Hydrogel Bioinks into 3D Tissue-Like Geometries.
41. Li L, Hu H, Zhu Y, et al., 2019, 3D-printed Ternary SiO CaO Adv Mater, 24:391–6.
2
P O bioglass-Ceramic Scaffolds with Tunable Compositions https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102800
2 5
and Properties for Bone Regeneration. Ceramics Int, 52. Silva T, Moreira-Silva J, Marques A, et al., 2014, Marine
45:10997–1005. Origin Collagens and its Potential Applications. Mar Drugs,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.183 12:5881–901.

58 International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4