Page 65 - IJB-7-4

Lin, et al.
Properties. Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 88:140–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201600472
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.018 103. Taymour R, Kilian D, Ahlfeld T, et al., 2021, 3D Bioprinting
93. Alksne M, Kalvaityte M, Simoliunas E, et al., 2020, In Vitro of Hepatocytes: Core-shell Structured Co-cultures with
Comparison of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite Fibroblasts for Enhanced Functionality. Sci Rep, 11:5130.
and Polylactic Acid/Bioglass Composite Scaffolds: Insights https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84384-6
into Materials for Bone Regeneration. J Mech Behav Biomed 104. Hong SY, Ji SK, Jung B, et al., 2019, Coaxial Bioprinting
Mater, 104:103641. of Cell-laden Vascular Constructs Using a Gelatin-tyramine
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmbbm.2020.103641 Bioink. Biomater Sci, 7:4578–87.
94. Kim WJ, Yun HS, Kim GH, 2017, An Innovative Cell-laden https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm00618k
α-TCP/Collagen Scaffold Fabricated Using a Two-step 105. Cui J, Wang H, Shi Q, et al., 2019, Multicellular Co-Culture
Printing Process for Potential Application in Regenerating in Three-Dimensional Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogels for
Hard Tissues. Sci Rep, 7:3181. Liver Tissue Engineering. Molecules, 24:1762.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03455-9 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091762
95. Feng C, Zhang W, Deng C, et al., 2017, 3D Printing of Lotus 106. Han X, Sun M, Chen B, et al., 2021, Lotus Seedpod-inspired
Root‐Like Biomimetic Materials for Cell Delivery and Tissue Internal Vascularized 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue
Regeneration. Adv Sci, 4:1700401. Repair. Bioact Mater, 6:1639–52.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700401 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.019
96. Zhang M, Lin R, Wang X, et al., 2020, 3D Printing of 107. Gao Q, Liu Z, Lin Z, et al., 2017, 3D Bioprinting of Vessel-
Haversian Bone-Mimicking Scaffolds for Multicellular like Structures with Multi-level Fluidic Channels. ACS
Delivery in Bone Regeneration. Sci Adv, 6:eaaz6725. Biomater Sci Eng, 3:399–408.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz 6725 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00643
97. Wang X, Lin M, Kang Y, 2019, Engineering Porous 108. Ma X, Xin Q, Wei Z, et al., 2016, Deterministically Patterned
β-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) Scaffolds with Multiple Biomimetic Human iPSC-Derived Hepatic Model Via Rapid
Channels to Promote Cell Migration, Proliferation, and 3D Bioprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 113:2206.
Angiogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interf, 11:9223–32. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524510113
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b22041 109. Xie M, Yu K, Yuan K, et al., 2019, Protocols of 3D Bioprinting
98. Chimene D, Miller L, Cross LM, et al., 2020, Nanoengineered of Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel Based Bioinks. J Vis Exp,
Osteoinductive Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Bone Tissue. ACS 154:e60545.
Appl Mater Interf, 12:15976–88. https://doi.org/10.3791/60545
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19037 110. Xue JM, Feng C, Xia LG, et al., 2018, Assembly Preparation
99. Moon YW, Choi IJ, Koh YH, et al., 2015, Macroporous of Multilayered Biomaterials with High Mechanical Strength
Alumina Scaffolds Consisting of Highly Microporous Hollow and Bone-Forming Bioactivity. Chem Mater, 30:4646–57.
Filaments Using Three-Dimensional Ceramic/Camphene- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01272
Based Co-extrusion. J Eur Ceramic Soc, 35:4623–7. 111. Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, et al., 2015, Medical
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.08.017 3D Printing for the Radiologist. Radiographics, 35:1965–88.
100. Ye W, Li H, et al., 2020, 3D Printing of Gelatin Methacrylate- https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140320
based Nerve Guidance Conduits with Multiple Channels. 112. Hallem A, Javaid M, Saxena A, 2018, Additive Manufacturing
Mater Des, 192:108757. Applications in Cardiology: A Review. Egypt Heart J, 70:433–41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108757 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2018.09.008
101. Ke X, Zhuang C, Yang X, et al., 2017, Enhancing the 113. Odeh M, Levin D, Inziello J, et al., 2019, Methods for
Osteogenic Capability of Core-Shell Bilayered Bioceramic Verification of 3D Printed Anatomic Model Accuracy Using
Microspheres with Adjustable Biodegradation. ACS Appl Cardiac Models as an Example. 3D Print Med, 5:6.
Mater Interf, 9:24497–510. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0043-1
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b06798 114. Vukicevic M, Mosadegh B, Min JK, et al., 2017, Cardiac 3D
102. Pistry P, Aied A, Alexander M, et al., 2017, Bioprinting Using Printing and its Future Directions. Jacc Cardiovasc Imaging,
Mechanically Robust Core–Shell Cell‐Laden Hydrogel 10:171–84.
Strands. Macromol Biosci, 17:1600472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.001

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4 61