Page 119 - IJB-8-1
P. 119

Lou, et al.
           release of nickel ions. This explains why the antibacterial   following the same process as that for WNC and PNC.
           activity  of  PNC  is  better  than  that  of  WNC  because   On the other hand, electron transfer occurs between GNC
           PNC can produce a higher concentration of nickel ions   and bacteria, inhibiting or even interrupting the metabolic
                                                                                   [65]
           around  it.  GNC  and  PNC  have  similar  morphological   process of the bacteria .  The  electrons  accepted  by
           characteristics, but the former released fewer nickel ions   GO mediate  the generation  of ROS on its oxygen-
           than the latter. This is mainly because the presence of GO   containing  functional  group , and some of the  ROS
                                                                                       [66]
           on the surface of GNC hinders the release of nickel ions.  will become intracellular ROS due to the internalization
               The nickel ion release  rate  of GNC is between   of  bacteria [67,68] .  The  remaining  part  will  be  distributed
           PNC  and  GNC,  but  the  level  of  ROS  is  significantly   around the bacteria as extracellular ROS, enhancing the
           lower than that of PNC and WNC during the incubation   oxidative  stress  on  the  bacteria.  The  strong  oxidative
           period (Figure 7). Therefore, the excellent antibacterial   stress  effect  increases  the  permeability  of  the  cell
           activity  of GNC cannot  be explained  by nickel  ions   membrane and leads to the penetration and destruction of
           and the intracellular ROS mediated by ions. In fact, the   the bacterial cell membrane.
           antibacterial  effect  of  GNC  was  faster  than  those  for   The antibacterial  process of GNC  on bacteria  is
           WNC and PNC, and the sterilization is more thorough.   illustrated  in  Figure  9.  In  the  initial  stage  of  bacterial
           The results of the agar plate experiment showed that the   inoculation on the surface of GNC, GO exerts the main
           bacterial  cell  viability  on  GNC  decreased  significantly   antibacterial effect, because of the low concentration of the
           after 1 h of incubation (Figure 5B and D). At the same   nickel ions released on the surface of GNC (Figure 9B).
           time, there are still a large number of surviving bacteria   Due to the non-oxidative electron transfer between GO
           on the surface of WNC and PNC. For bacteria on GNC,   and bacteria, the metabolism of the bacteria is severely
           the short survival time is insufficient to accumulate high   inhibited by GO, resulting in decreased bacterial activity.
           level of intracellular ROS. The antibacterial performance   Meanwhile,  the  ROS mediated  by GO cause  oxidative
           of WNC and PNC in the agar plate assessment also shows   stress  damage  to  bacteria.  As  the  incubation  time
           that the antibacterial effect of nickel ions is a relatively   increases,  nickel  ions continue  to accumulate  around
           slow process, and the fast-acting antibacterial ability of   the bacteria. Since the effect of GO on bacteria is more
           GNC was not entirely derived from nickel ions. It shows   rapid in the initial period, the function of nickel ions is
           that the GO on GNC also participates in the antibacterial   not  fully  exerted.  However,  the  high  concentration  of
           process, and the effect of GO on bacteria is more rapid,   nickel  ions  further  enhances  the  antibacterial  effect  of
           resulting in the antibacterial effect of nickel ions is not   GNC by inducing the generation of ROS (Figure 9C).
           fully exerted.                                      Finally, under the synergistic effect of nickel ions and GO
                                                               (Figure 9D) inhibited respiration and oxidative stress lead
           3.5. Possible antibacterial mechanism               to the death of bacteria. There are differences in the cell
                                                               walls and outer membranes between Gram-negative and
           The GO coating prepared on the metal can form a GO-  Gram-positive bacteria. S. aureus is an aerobic bacteria,
           metal  system  with  the  metal  matrix.  The  antibacterial   and its final electron acceptor is oxygen rather than the
           properties  of GO-metal  systems have been widely   extracellular environment, and a thicker cell wall makes
           reported [44,62] . In the environment of incubating bacteria,
           GO can act as a terminal electron acceptor in bacterial
           respiratory chain and extract  electrons from microbial
           membranes, realizing  the reduction of GO  [63,64] .
           Panda et al.  studied the antibacterial properties of the
                     [65]
           GO-metal system and reported that the electron transport
           pathway can be interrupted by the GO-metal system and
           inhibit the metabolic process of bacteria, the functional
           groups exist on the surface and edges of GO that serve as
           sites for the generation of ROS after accepting electrons.
           Qiu  et  al.  prepared  a GO coating  on the surface  of
                   [49]
           titanium, and also confirmed that the antibacterial ability
           of the coating comes from the electron transfer between
           the bacteria and the GO-metal system.
               Since the coverage of GO on the surface of GNC
           is incomplete, the excellent antibacterial activity of GNC
           mainly comes  from  two  aspects.  On  the one  hand,  the
           nickel  ions released  from  the  surface  of  GNC induce   Figure  8. Concentration  of nickel  ions released  by the  coated
           the generation of intracellular ROS in the bacterial cells,   samples.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1       105
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124