Page 169 - IJB-8-1
P. 169

Aihemaiti, et al.
           plane motion. The extruder was installed on the Z-axis   filament feeding speed, were studied by an orthogonal
           worktable. After slicing the 3D CAD model and setting   experiment. Orthogonal experiments L9 with four
           the scanning mode, a G-code file containing the printing   factors and three levels were designed according to
           path was generated and imported into the motion control   our former research, as shown in Table 1. The nozzle
           software of the 3D printer to start the printing.   diameter of 0.4  mm, printing temperature of 210°C,
                                                               hotbed temperature of 40°C, and printing spacing
           (2) Mechanical test and 3D full-field strain        of 0.4 mm were set as the constant parameters in the
           measurement setup                                   experiments.
           A mechanical testing machine (3005t, Shenzhen Regel
           Instrument Co., Ltd., China) was used for three-point   (2) Bending experiment
           bending experiments. During the bending experiments,   The  cuboid specimens  were designed  according  to the
           a 3D full-field strain measurement system (3DFSMS)   ISO 178-2018 test standard, and the specimen dimensions
           (XTOP 3D  Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.) was      are 80 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm. Bending specimens of nine
           applied to photograph and analyze the deformation and   schemes  according  to the  orthogonal  experiment  were
           3D strains of the specimens, as shown in Figure 1B. The   fabricated  by the 3D printing platform  as described  in
           system contained two camera groups, each with a pair   Figure 1A. Five specimens were printed for each group
           of cameras. The camera groups could cooperate with   of process parameters.
           each other to detect and analyze a sample from different   The mechanical test and 3DFSM of the specimen
           directions simultaneously. Camera group  1 captured   were performed in the experimental  setup shown
           the front surface of the specimen, and camera group 2   in  Figure  1B.  According to the requirements of the
           captured the lower surface of the bending specimen.   test  standard, the  span of the  bending  specimens  was
           The surfaces of all the specimens were initially painted   64 mm, and the loading rate was 2 mm/min. The load
           with white paint as a background, after which they were   and displacement  values of the tested specimen were
           covered with a random black paint speckle pattern.  recorded, and the bending stress and strain were calculated
           (3) Printing temperature measurement setup          according to the obtained load and displacement after the
                                                               bending experiments.
           The printing temperature of a single deposited line was
           measured and analyzed by an infrared thermal camera   (3) Internal defect analysis of specimen
           (FRIL A40). The experiment setup is shown in Figure 1C.   The existence of pore defects in FDM printed parts is a
           Single lines were deposited in the thin stainless-steel   common  problem. Therefore,  different  failure  forms  of
           sheet (0.08 mm). When the nozzle deposited a line in the   the specimens should be related to the internal defects.
           stainless-steel sheet, the infrared thermal camera captured
           the dynamic variation process of the temperature field on   A  micro-X-ray 3D imaging  system  (YXLON Cheetah,
                                                               Germany) was used to detect and reconstruct the internal
           the bottom surface of the sheet during the printing process.
                                                               defects of the specimens, and the internal pore geometries,
           (4) Printing pressure measurement setup             volumes,  and  spatial  distributions were  also  analyzed.
           To  compare  the  printing  pressures  of  different  process   Figure 2A shows the diagram of the sampling area for
                                                               the  defect  analysis obtained  using the  micro-X-ray  3D
           parameters, 3DFSMS was used to measure the deformation   imaging system. The scanning range was 10 mm × 7 mm
           of stainless-steel  sheets (0.08  mm) during the single-  × 3 mm. A scan resolution of 15 μm, a peak tube potential
           line deposition. The experimental setup is similar to the   of 80 kV, and a target current of 62.5 μA were set as the
           temperature measurement setup shown in Figure 1D.   basic measurement parameters.
           2.3. Experiment methods                             (4) Analysis of cross-sectional geometry of the single

           (1) Orthogonal experimental design                  deposited line
           Four important process parameters, including the HA   In FDM printing, the molten material is extruded from the
           content (mass ratio), layer thickness, printing speed, and   nozzle, and a line is deposited on the hotbed (or the front


           Table 1. Factors and their levels
           Factors HA content A (%) Layer thickness B (mm) Printing speed C (mm/s) Filament feeding speed D (mm/s)
           Level 1         0                  0.1                    30                       0.7
           Level 2        10                 0.15                    40                       0.8
           Level 3        20                  0.2                    50                       0.9

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1       155
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174